10-05-2011, 11:22 PM
Hello everyone, I came across this fascinating forum the other day after re-igniting my interest in the JFK assassination, mainly by watching the 'Evidence of Revision' films.
I've been immensely impressed by the level of knowledge contained in these threads and just wanted to ask a question.
I've seen alot of comment about the LBJ role, its centrality to the plot, or lack thereof. Can any of the posters who believe that LBJ was not directly responsible or centrally involved in the plot outline briefly why they believe this to be so?
I can't give a great argument for him being involved aside from the apparent motives that someone in his position would have and his personal history. That said, I've been unable to locate a concise argument on this forum from the detractors of the 'LBJ didn't do it' contingent.
I'm sorry if I'm treading over old ground here and I'm not trying to antagonize anybody. I'm just genuinely interested to hear both sides of the story.
I've been immensely impressed by the level of knowledge contained in these threads and just wanted to ask a question.
I've seen alot of comment about the LBJ role, its centrality to the plot, or lack thereof. Can any of the posters who believe that LBJ was not directly responsible or centrally involved in the plot outline briefly why they believe this to be so?
I can't give a great argument for him being involved aside from the apparent motives that someone in his position would have and his personal history. That said, I've been unable to locate a concise argument on this forum from the detractors of the 'LBJ didn't do it' contingent.
I'm sorry if I'm treading over old ground here and I'm not trying to antagonize anybody. I'm just genuinely interested to hear both sides of the story.