The LBJ-Did-It Operation Continues to Unfold

[James Lewis]

Actually, when you look at the totality of things, there is one person who could be said to have connections to the sponsors AND the facilitators of the cover-up, i.e. the Warren Commission. There is only one person who had provable connections to the most crucial people on the Commission (Allen Dulles, Gerald Ford, John J. McCloy, David Belin, and Albert Jenner). There is only one person who had something to personally gain from the assassination, besides LBJ. If LBJ did indeed orchestrate the assassination, why would he put himself very near the middle of the shooting, where a single stray shot could have ended his presidency before it even started? That doesn't show good planning, to say the least. Back to my original point, there is only ONE person who: A - knew about the plans to invade Cuba before Kennedy was even elected...B - intimately knew the people involved in the planning of that invasion...C - actually hired some of these same people to work for him when he later became President. And that person is one Richard M. Nixon, and for me, the Rosetta Stone of both the Nixon presidency and the Kennedy assassination is Watergate. Remember, no less that Gordon Liddy has publicly stated that the "official" version of Watergate is "as wrong as a pamphlet for the Flat Earth Society" - and he was in a position to know. Watergate was a power struggle between the Nixon White House and the CIA, and the CIA won, for reasons not the least of which was knowledge of the Kennedy assassination. H.R. Haldeman said in "The Ends Of Power" that when the term "Bay Of Pigs" was used on the Watergate tapes, it was actually referring to the assassination. And...he (Nixon) used that information to attempt to blackmail the CIA to cooperate in the Watergate cover-up.

This begs two questions: How did Nixon know to use this particular information to attempt to blackmail the CIA, in general; and how did he know to use this information to blackmail Richard Helms in particular, unless he either knew about the conspiracy or actively participated in it?? That's a few too many coincidences for my tastes...and I don't believe in coincidence. Also, is it a coincidence that Nixon tried to hire both David Belin and Albert Jenner to attempt to "defend" Nixon during Watergate? Why not hire registered experts in cover-ups to defend another cover-up? Believe me, I understand the "shadow government", the CIA, and the various and sundry people behind the power in this country. But in my opinion, to pull off something as large as the assassination, you need a point man...someone who both represents the interests of the shadow government, and has both the ambition and venal pride and cockiness to want to be the head of that enterprise. And the only person who fits all of that criteria...is Richard M. Nixon.

LBJ did not control LHO, and did not know who controlled LHO.

The sponsors of the public execution of JFK did.

Good point. If LBJ did....in part [learn who did]...it was way, way after the events. And never did he control him; likely had never heard of him until the day of the murder...only knew [perhaps] a selected patsy was at hand [as standard operational procedure in false flag and deep political/ black op/ black bag ops]....of which he WAS familiar. Those in charge kept LBJ in the dark, as well; and under threat of being falsely exposed as the one responsible. He was NOT fully innocent, IMHO, but also far from fully responsible....very, VERY far from it..... He, like Nixon and many others, were 'later patsies' when their usefulness had run its course for those really in power and really behind Dallas and other such events......