30-05-2011, 05:02 AM
Seamus,
No one knows sin better than a sinner knows it.
That being noted, I must take the strongest possible exception to your post here.
In the past I have led many charges against Rigby's Greer-related hypothesis. And I am on record with my contempt for what the EF has become -- a disinformation bazaar of the most contemptible order (in spite of the presence there of a handful of honorable and accomplished researchers).
Further, often I have been less than charitable when taking on individuals whose intellectual failures -- honest though they may be -- in my opinion play into the hands of the JFK assassination's Sponsors and/or Facilitators.
But your characterizations ("lunatic") and comparisons to cartoon characters ("Peter Griffin") of Rigby and others do not rise above the level of churlish schoolyard taunts. In addition, dragging in the likes of Carroll and Vaughan is wholly unprovoked within the discernable context of a post which seems devoid of thematic or literary merit.
(Let it be noted that years ago on the EF I was the object of the former's poison pen. I dealt with him deftly and moved on, and I harbor no affection for the man.)
I'm afraid that when you accuse others of being guilty of "unsophisticated schtick" you prompt the unavoidable response, "Physician, heal thyself."
Seamus, here it is in a nutshell: If you wish to make the case that Rigby is an agent provocateur, then do so. We're listening.
If you wish to expose the failures of his Greer argument, the floor is yours.
And keep in mind -- in the forefront of your mind -- that I would not support removal from the DPF of your post which I find to be devoid of merit and wholly counter-productive to our shared missions.
But this sort of swill you're spilling seems to be coming directly from a Foster's oil can.
You're better than this.
Knock off the bullshit.
CD
No one knows sin better than a sinner knows it.
That being noted, I must take the strongest possible exception to your post here.
In the past I have led many charges against Rigby's Greer-related hypothesis. And I am on record with my contempt for what the EF has become -- a disinformation bazaar of the most contemptible order (in spite of the presence there of a handful of honorable and accomplished researchers).
Further, often I have been less than charitable when taking on individuals whose intellectual failures -- honest though they may be -- in my opinion play into the hands of the JFK assassination's Sponsors and/or Facilitators.
But your characterizations ("lunatic") and comparisons to cartoon characters ("Peter Griffin") of Rigby and others do not rise above the level of churlish schoolyard taunts. In addition, dragging in the likes of Carroll and Vaughan is wholly unprovoked within the discernable context of a post which seems devoid of thematic or literary merit.
(Let it be noted that years ago on the EF I was the object of the former's poison pen. I dealt with him deftly and moved on, and I harbor no affection for the man.)
I'm afraid that when you accuse others of being guilty of "unsophisticated schtick" you prompt the unavoidable response, "Physician, heal thyself."
Seamus, here it is in a nutshell: If you wish to make the case that Rigby is an agent provocateur, then do so. We're listening.
If you wish to expose the failures of his Greer argument, the floor is yours.
And keep in mind -- in the forefront of your mind -- that I would not support removal from the DPF of your post which I find to be devoid of merit and wholly counter-productive to our shared missions.
But this sort of swill you're spilling seems to be coming directly from a Foster's oil can.
You're better than this.
Knock off the bullshit.
CD
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene