10-06-2011, 04:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-06-2011, 04:52 PM by Seamus Coogan.)
Charles Drago Wrote:I understand and deeply appreciate your own understanding of this case, Vasilios.
Like Seamus, I hesitate to attempt to name the true sponsors of the assassination other than to engage in a process of elimination -- an ultimately flawed process that cannot hope to deliver us to our common destination.
Have to have a giggle about us all being stuck in 'facilitator' purgatory.
Well it's that old adage isn't it CD. Which I'm sure you've heard.
The more we learn the less we really know, yet the smarter we think we are the dumber we become. It's that Irish barstad Murphy and that damn 'law' of his lol. It's funny. When I started out I'm proud to say that I knew I didn't know anything and my search was to find the very, very best sources and researchers I could. Its like Len Osanic says (and I agree heartily) that it's the guy who says he knows everything about the case that tends to know the least.
A classic example is the new guy who turns up and claims Johnson did it. I'm puzzled as to why sooooo many people go with this Johnson stuff. I think JFK the film has a bit to do with it. But it was really dying out awhile ago (thankfully) now its back with a vengence. I am deeply suspicious of it myself.
Thoughts on this would be good to get. CD would you like to participate in my little 'Johnson Myth's' essay? Im trying to con Vasilios and James too partake in as well.
"In the Kennedy assassination we must be careful of running off into the ether of our own imaginations." Carl Ogelsby circa 1992