12-06-2011, 05:52 AM
Vasilios Vazakas Wrote:Israel is not the sponsor of the assassination and the majority of us we are on agreement. They might have been used at the facilitator or operational level but we don't have the evidence. Talking of Final Judgement that book shares on thing in common with Perfect cover. I don't imply that they are of the same value, you do know my opinion reagrding Final Judgement. However they both mention a simulated attack/fake attempt in Dealey Plaza. Any thoughts on this scenario?
The sine qua non for effective disinformation is the inclusion of verifiable data in its midst. The more revelatory in nature that data is, the more persuasive the disinformation will be.
The simulated attack hypothesis is sound, profoundly underappreciated, and ultimately essential to the process of understanding the structure of the final attack scenario. Piper was NOT the first to postulate it; George Michael Evica early on had argued for just such a component in the prime Facilitators' attack meta-structure.
Back in the early 1990s my own relatively primitive thinking about the assassination produced just such a scenario. I had neither the standing nor the chutzpah to argue for it publicly.
George Michael had both.
(The Evica simulated attack hypothesis directly gave birth to Vince Palamara's "Third Alternative" work -- the title of which was taken directly from and with the permission of George Michael, who generously helped direct Vince's thinking along these lines.)
Nothing that I've learned since has moved me off this position. Much that I've learned has helped sustain and evolve my original thinking.
The deeply layered Dallas structure, in all its nuance, leads me to conclude that no other similar scenario could have been run simultaneously -- including the Chicago "plot".
Finally: To categorize "Israel" as a False Sponsor is NOT to absolve Israeli interests from participation in the assassination at many levels of Facilitation -- including very high levels indeed.