14-06-2011, 10:42 PM
Well that reply was essentially what one does this kinda thing for Jan. That Adam Parfrey stuff is true gold. Thanks.
As for Martin. I had a look around for his writings on the net after I found his skeleton key demolition and there wasn't to much which was a shame. He has a writing style similar to mine (he's pretty aggressive in his subject matter lol-however I have use of some fantastic editors that curb some of my indulgences). I came across people with differing opinions on him. He drew a bit of heat for his look into Alien abductions as an MK Ultra type operation. It's actually something I have found to be highly plausible myself. Sadly, Martin couldn't quite nail it on the head. People like myself found his essay overlong and repetitive with little by the way of evidence offered. Had he taken a slightly less serious tone, it would have been a great speculative piece with good pricks of anecdotal evidence. Sadly, it kind of convoluted itself.
Martin then of course came under fire from the 'Aliens did it' crowd.
Shame it's a potentially intriguing piece worthy of revisitation.
The final piece I agree is a little to wordy and needed to be a little more stark.
Essentially what I am saying is that Farrell brags the Torbitt Document predicted the German stay behinds vis a vis Gladio. The problem was of course that Thomas's rendering of the Torbitt document occurred well after Gladio came above board. Farrell was also saying on one hand that Thomas had accumulated all the known evidence and put it together but Thomas is saying someone gave it to him too publish. It seems aas if Farrell cocked up and divulged how Thomas put it all together. There was no 'miraclulous document from thin air'.
I hope that clears it up for you. But in clearing it up of course there's more questions. Namely, what is Childress' motivations in all of this if he's prepared to utilise compromised material and then force some poor buggar to endorse Zirbel.
As for Martin. I had a look around for his writings on the net after I found his skeleton key demolition and there wasn't to much which was a shame. He has a writing style similar to mine (he's pretty aggressive in his subject matter lol-however I have use of some fantastic editors that curb some of my indulgences). I came across people with differing opinions on him. He drew a bit of heat for his look into Alien abductions as an MK Ultra type operation. It's actually something I have found to be highly plausible myself. Sadly, Martin couldn't quite nail it on the head. People like myself found his essay overlong and repetitive with little by the way of evidence offered. Had he taken a slightly less serious tone, it would have been a great speculative piece with good pricks of anecdotal evidence. Sadly, it kind of convoluted itself.
Martin then of course came under fire from the 'Aliens did it' crowd.
Shame it's a potentially intriguing piece worthy of revisitation.
The final piece I agree is a little to wordy and needed to be a little more stark.
Essentially what I am saying is that Farrell brags the Torbitt Document predicted the German stay behinds vis a vis Gladio. The problem was of course that Thomas's rendering of the Torbitt document occurred well after Gladio came above board. Farrell was also saying on one hand that Thomas had accumulated all the known evidence and put it together but Thomas is saying someone gave it to him too publish. It seems aas if Farrell cocked up and divulged how Thomas put it all together. There was no 'miraclulous document from thin air'.
I hope that clears it up for you. But in clearing it up of course there's more questions. Namely, what is Childress' motivations in all of this if he's prepared to utilise compromised material and then force some poor buggar to endorse Zirbel.
"In the Kennedy assassination we must be careful of running off into the ether of our own imaginations." Carl Ogelsby circa 1992