16-06-2011, 02:53 PM
He never really answered the first question about whether they were fair to Oswald.
He says he was fact finding, but never discusses the methodology of that fact finding.
I wouldn't either.
"The conclusions weren't rushed." "They were arrived at in their own due time." Rankin's outline saying Oswald did it was submitted on January 11th.
HE then uses that whole BS story about the autopsy materials not being available to them and blames that on the Kennedys.
He then concludes that all the controversy was caused by the critics.
"There was nothing fraudulent or sinister about it." How about Ford moving up the back wound. How about Rankin saying he would record Russell's dissent but then not doing so.
McCloy was as bad here as he was with the Japanese internment.
He says he was fact finding, but never discusses the methodology of that fact finding.
I wouldn't either.
"The conclusions weren't rushed." "They were arrived at in their own due time." Rankin's outline saying Oswald did it was submitted on January 11th.
HE then uses that whole BS story about the autopsy materials not being available to them and blames that on the Kennedys.
He then concludes that all the controversy was caused by the critics.
"There was nothing fraudulent or sinister about it." How about Ford moving up the back wound. How about Rankin saying he would record Russell's dissent but then not doing so.
McCloy was as bad here as he was with the Japanese internment.