JFKcountercoup reseacher shot by Dallas Cop

[Peter Lemkin]

I find very interesting the idea of draining the sprinker system. That should have been quite easy with one well planted device in each building - on the floor and place that would have the most effect on that system. JO seems to like to tie people up in 'conversation' to neutralize any new information being put forward. Jeff, just disagree, give your reasons for doing so and go away. Demanding others answer your questions certainly reminds me of the tactics of someone I long battles on the EF about 911. That was his main tactic for derailing conversations. The explanations were never to his satisfaction and the presenter's progress [unless one ignored him] was thwarted. The close coordination of the pre-blasts 14 and 17 seconds is also interesting. I'm not fully convinced that no planes or drones hit the buildings - but rather that it was only made to look so. I have seen from several persons a very odd [I admit] apparent melting of the planes into the wall of the building without making 'contact' - and this needs more work to convince me - but I'm open to it, if that is the way the evidence goes. I'll read the articles and see what I think. The plane-sized holes in the buildings seem to say otherwise. Also, as I remember, there were witnesses to at least the second plane hitting the building, not just on TV videos. While I admit that a lot of smoke and mirrors were used that day, this particular use of smoke and mirrors has not yet convinced me - but it is an area I've not looked at much. I've been more interested in the impossible way the buildings fell [according to the official version]. :mexican: