17-07-2011, 06:03 AM
(This post was last modified: 17-07-2011, 01:37 PM by Charles Drago.)
James H. Fetzer Wrote:"Would you explain why individuals killed on 9/11 would be missing from the DMF?" Maloney asked in her letters.
May I try?
It is in the best interests of the perpetrators of 9-11 and other, broadly similar conspiracies to provide false leads for and to promote disharmony to the extent of internecine warfare within investigative "communities" and, by extension, to demonize all conspiracy researchers in the minds of the general public.
If I were a 9-11 Facilitator, I would do what's necessary to get one big-name, well-intentioned investigator to state specifically that "alleged" victim John Doe is not listed on the DMF and thus was not killed in the attack -- only to have the distraught, enraged widow Doe appear publicly to chastise the cruel, borderline insane "conspiracist" and all of that ilk who would dare torture victims' families with this sort of wild claim.
An elegantly simple way to do this job? Keep the names off the list.
I might add that, once again, this likely is not an either/or situation.
So let's solve the mystery. Easier said than done, but knock on door after door until we find just one undead "victim" of the attacks.
Do I believe that some cell phone calls were falsified? Absolutely.
Do I believe that some cell phone calls were legit? Not quite.
Do I believe that some officially acknowledged "victims" are pure fiction. Absolutely.
Do I know that the coverup has multiple objectives that transcend protection of this particular conspiracy?
Yes.