18-07-2011, 04:34 PM
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:My comment was based on the fact that for some people the 911 event was so massive with so many actors and some complex it is simply too difficult to manage all the human resources in addition to the technical ones and the timing.
This is like a huge Hollywood movie production with a cast of thousands done with no rehearsal, taking place over many hours or even days involving the entire media and the participation of many government agencies, the airlines and all sorts of participants who could not have been read into the plot and acted on cue... and in 4 locations!
My sense is that there was some planning and it WAS a conspiracy, but not the one of the official narrative. I also believe that many were completely overwhelmed and confused and simply listened IMMEDIATELY to the government narrative fed by the media and a kind of group think took over. At that point it was not scripted in a formal sense, but the "world" and the "main actors" were simply responding as expecting by years of "psychological" conditioning. If you think of "emergency preparedness drills" and then an emergency "happens" all those trained to these things simply resort to their training and "act" accordingly. They have no idea even what has happened and why they are acting... it's just their training.
The media is like a herd as well.. one outlet listens to the other and copies their story.. sens out reporters to chase down the lead and in no time they are all focused on the same story... Remember the balloon boy?
Clearly there were victims of 911. But it also looks like the were made up ones as well. But why? Were the made up ones the compelling fictional characters used for psychological manipulation of the public? What else could be the reason? Obviously some people might have sought to personally exploit the situation and some did and were caught, I believe.
But I do find the reports of Indira Singh compelling in that these large complex organizations are now controlled and managed by enterprise software and getting back door access to it allows one person (who gets in the back door) to control huge organizations... or many of them since these huge organizations are already inter-locked into feed back and feed forward relationships.
This means to me, at least, that the conspiracy may not have involved all the actors who participated knowing they were were being controlled or actors so to speak. The vast majority of the 911 actors were simply doing what they were trained to do and "just following orders" and normal procedures. Once the basic elements took place... the rest was essentially on "auto pilot" and the "actors" were not acting...
Clearly anyone who commits a crime does not want to be caught and will use all sorts of strategies to deflect attention to him and cast blame on someone else... that gets him off the hook big time. So obviously getting those who are trying to solve the crime, confused and fighting amongst themselves is a damn good strategy. Toss a lot of chafe and false leads out there too.
We have seem this all. But the crime will be solved by careful examination of the crime scene and the evidence of the crime. While it's fine to speculate about means, motive and opportunity... these are only circumstantial and evidence. Can't win a case in court on means, motive and opportunity. These may lead to investigations but evidence must be found linking the suspects to the actual crime.
I thought this was supposed to be the DEEP POLITICS FORUM. I think you might have mistaken it for the SHALLOW SUPPOSITION CHAT ROOM instead.
GO_SECURE
monk
"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."
James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)
monk
"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."
James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)