21-07-2011, 03:19 AM
Bill,
Please try to be logical here and read my response carefully.
You ask, "Then why say they are dizinformation [sic] agents, which requires them by definition to be associated with intelligence agency or network?"
Who is the "they" you reference and I don't?
Next you ask, "What was my original conclusion and rush to illogical judgement wholly uninformed by a deep understanding of deep political processes again?"
I'll try one more time: Your original conclusion, in your own words, was that I "insist [EF] is an arm of some government Intelligence agency". I made no such claim -- ever -- either here or on EF. Your inference is unjustified, absent all logic, let alone supporting evidence, and at variance with what we might expect from a seasoned observer of deep politics at work.
Finally you ask, "So then who is Colby working for again?" I reiterate, I have demonstrated that the entity calling itself "Colby" is in fact comprised of more than one writer. I illustrated this reality by demonstrating the disparities among numerous "Colby" posts.
And by the way, I place the name "Colby" within quotation marks because it is a fictive construct designed to spread disinformation and sow disharmony among individuals who should be acting as comrades.
Like you and me.
Who is "Colby" working for?
Ultimately, the forces that struck JFK.
Have you learned nothing from our struggles? Do you not understand that we are at war?
Out with it, Bill. Why the hair across your ass?
Please try to be logical here and read my response carefully.
You ask, "Then why say they are dizinformation [sic] agents, which requires them by definition to be associated with intelligence agency or network?"
Who is the "they" you reference and I don't?
Next you ask, "What was my original conclusion and rush to illogical judgement wholly uninformed by a deep understanding of deep political processes again?"
I'll try one more time: Your original conclusion, in your own words, was that I "insist [EF] is an arm of some government Intelligence agency". I made no such claim -- ever -- either here or on EF. Your inference is unjustified, absent all logic, let alone supporting evidence, and at variance with what we might expect from a seasoned observer of deep politics at work.
Finally you ask, "So then who is Colby working for again?" I reiterate, I have demonstrated that the entity calling itself "Colby" is in fact comprised of more than one writer. I illustrated this reality by demonstrating the disparities among numerous "Colby" posts.
And by the way, I place the name "Colby" within quotation marks because it is a fictive construct designed to spread disinformation and sow disharmony among individuals who should be acting as comrades.
Like you and me.
Who is "Colby" working for?
Ultimately, the forces that struck JFK.
Have you learned nothing from our struggles? Do you not understand that we are at war?
Out with it, Bill. Why the hair across your ass?