03-08-2011, 04:33 PM
Charles Drago Wrote:Thank you very much, John.
FWIW, I have serious problems with Mr. Schotz's conclusion as to the identities of the Sponsors of JFK's murder.
He writes: "At the time of the assassination what would have happened if it had been acknowledged that the assassination had been a high level conspiracy of the US military intelligence apparatus?"
My answer: Yet again, and in the absence of presentation by the author of the conspiracy model on which his analysis is built, a Facilitator of the assassination would have been identified as its Sponsor; as a consequence, the coverup would have been preserved and enhanced.
CD: You disagree with the view held by many JFK researchers, that JFK was killed by a "high level conspiracy of the US military intelligence apparatus", but you never reveal who you believe is behind it. I agree that this murder was likely more far ranging and more international in scope than a US intelligence black op, but I agree with Marty that had the government and media acknowledged this much it would have gone a long way to restore much of what has been lost, probably prevented the murders of MLK and RFK, and who knows what else? Just my opinion.
I don't think we will ever know the "who" and have always believed that the "why" was the salient point for people to grasp.
Dawn