09-08-2011, 05:21 PM
I have no idea if the following has been addressed elsewhere.
HYPOTHESIS:
Given the unprecedented (at the time of their design/construction) height and mass of WTC 1 and 2 and thus the potential for unprecedented disaster in the event of collapse(s), controlled demolition capabilities were put in place during the construction phase.
The configuration of the system(s) would have allowed for relatively inconspicuous and/or easily disguised maintenance and updating.
This plan and its implementation would have been closely guarded secrets for reasons relating to security and financial matters.
At some point, WTC 7 would have been fitted or retrofitted with similar capabilities.
The "pull it" comment would make sense within this hypothesis.
HYPOTHESIS:
Given the unprecedented (at the time of their design/construction) height and mass of WTC 1 and 2 and thus the potential for unprecedented disaster in the event of collapse(s), controlled demolition capabilities were put in place during the construction phase.
The configuration of the system(s) would have allowed for relatively inconspicuous and/or easily disguised maintenance and updating.
This plan and its implementation would have been closely guarded secrets for reasons relating to security and financial matters.
At some point, WTC 7 would have been fitted or retrofitted with similar capabilities.
The "pull it" comment would make sense within this hypothesis.