How Demolition Charges Were Placed in WTC 1 AND 2: A Hypothesis

[Charles Drago]

I agree with Tony and Robbyn Summers in that these false conspiracy theories do nothing for our understanding of what really occurred on 9/11 other than to distract from the real issues that should be addressed.

Bill Kelly

"False conspiracy theories" and related flawed conclusions about 9-11 which should be recognized IMMEDIATELY as such by you, me, and every other seasoned, honorable researcher/scholar of deep political events include:

-- Bush knew -- FALSE Sponsor.
-- Bush was in on it -- FALSE Sponsor.
-- The Bush Administration ordered it -- FALSE Sponsor.
-- The U.S. Government ordered it -- FALSE Sponsor.
AND
-- OBL ordered it -- FALSE Sponsor.
-- 19 Arab hijackers armed with box cutters pulled it off -- FALSE Mechanics.

I would further submit that the absence of a discernable Facilitator level in the USG-approved 9-11 conspiracy theory is sufficient to falsify it:

Given that the 9-11 attacks were the planned-for end results of a deep political assassination* conspiracy ...

Deep political assassination conspiracies are constructed on the Sponsor/Facilitator/Mechanic model.
The USG-approved 9-11 conspiracy theory does not present a Facilitator level.
The USG-approved 9-11 conspiracy theory does not describe a deep political assassination conspiracy.

As for Summers and Swann, they are making straw man arguments specifically designed to sway their champions within the deep political research community. They argue -- quite properly -- that "Bush knew about it/did it" is patently absurd on its face, and then conclude that THEREFORE ALL CONSPIRACY THEORIES BUT THE USG CONSPIRACY THEORY are equally absurd.

The conclusion is illogical and designed to disrupt and disinform. Summers and Swann know better.
_____________________________________

*I do indeed view the 9-11 conspiracy to be an assassination conspiracy -- an argument for another thread, I suspect.