How Demolition Charges Were Placed in WTC 1 AND 2: A Hypothesis

[James Lewis]

Like I said...if you actually believe that planes, and planes alone, caused those buildings to come down, there are nice pieces of swampland in West Texas for you. Period. No. Way. In. Hell.

[quote=James Lewis]And if you really believe that, I have a nice piece of swampland in West Texas to sell you. Sorry, but not all buildings are imploded from the bottom up. Most sports stadiums, for example. And if they weren't brought down by demolition, please explain in a logical way how else they could have come down.

If you really believe that mere fire caused this, I refer you to the fire at the Windsor building in Madrid, Spain, which burned for over 24 hours and not only did the core of the building remain intact, but even a crane that was on top of the building remained standing. And the core of that building wasn't nearly as robust as those of the World Trade Center.



Tony and Robbyn didn't sell me anything and you can't either. You evaluate everything you learn and I will do the same. You don't want to believe that those buildings came down because airplanes flew into them and caused the destruction, then don't. The government allows you to believe whatever you want and know nothing.