03-09-2011, 01:12 PM
Magda Hassan Wrote:No it's no fair to call you a disinfo agent and I'm not sure any one has though it has been referred to. Nor is it good play to drag up some ancient article of Charles and imply that this is him today. Charles, like any good researcher, is always incorporating new information as it becomes available and has been tested and building from that. I certainly hope we all grow and learn from our experiences.
The fact that some one saw an airplane chair at the pentagon 11 days later is pretty meaningless and this is what you don't seem to be getting. To settle for that as proof positive is not going to make you look good. To tell us to be more trusting of the government official line isn't going to cut it here either. It may well be that there really was a plane but I'd like to see a whole lot more than a chair. I'd like to see the hundreds of videos that were confiscated for one. I'd also like to know why we haven't been permitted to see one of them in 10 years while we get to see the towers being hit and collapsing ad nauseum. The lack of videos of the pentagon is the smoking gun that there is some thing to hide.
Where did I say proof positive? I never said it was 11 days later. That only came up last night for the 1st time. My original point was how do we explain away this story. That is what we are doing and that's fine if it makes more sense. I'm saying that just because I play devil's advocate makes me a secret agent is goofy. You're spinning things in a way that isn't accurate.