29-09-2011, 05:06 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:>No, Mr. Doyle, no such interpretation is intended, or
>appropriate. I was simply trying to make a point regarding
>that one word, which has produced such acrimony, irrespective
>of what's in the book.
I'm sorry but your comments strike me with a particular disingenuousness. I don't think your patronizing reference to the word "Mastermind" quite answers what is at hand here. Sure a good case can be made for Lyndon Johnson being a criminally-natured person, and even should be in order to educate the public about the true nature of those involved in JFK's assassination, however never should this be used to bring sole attention to a scapegoat being used to deter further looking in to the greater culprits. There's numerous reasons why Lyndon Johnson would not possibly deserve the central role you insist on. There's too much evidence to show serious control from outside powers and state security institutions and their politically-biased members. When one looks at the bigger picture it becomes clear that forces were involved well beyond Lyndon Johnson or his control and that the fact he was asking if he was being shot at tells you right there he wasn't commanding anything. I don't find it genuine to say Johnson got some CIA members to go along when the pattern of covert control, especially in the false sponsor arrangements, showed a degree and scope of influence well above and beyond old bull**** Lyndon. Those with a better grasp of the greater spheres of influence would see Lyndon was set-up with charges to compromise him and make him desperate enough to court a filthy assassination. That kind of pattern is typical of CIA and a pure fingerprint of their modus operandi showing through. Douglass detects this right away. Hoover was also fatally-compromisable. The reason Kennedy was killed is because he couldn't be caught in such devious devices and was therefore a threat to their underhanded control. Johnson was placed in the vice presidency as a hedge by this power. Johnson did NOT place himself. Your assertions show a visible lack of honest appreciation of the true nature of this maneuvering and trying to force an interpretation that isn't accurate to the facts. I'm sorry, but I thought Charles was being tough on you and was ignoring the service you were doing in exposing Johnson, but I can see from your writing that you have a purposeful contempt for the truth in this matter and I'm forced to side with his opinion. To insult the efforts of some seriously coherent and well-researched attempts to show the true greater background outside of Johnson is, in my mind, to show open contempt for established Kennedy assassination history and what is best known about it. It's simply preposterous to suggest members of CIA said to themselves "Hey, Lyndon's gonna do it, let's help him along". This is a violation of the clear pattern of influence and which side controlled the other. It's clear from our form of government that one single person could never pull-off such a feat. We are not a monarchy and have bureaucratic systems of check and balance that would make it impossible for one man to do such a thing and not be noticed. This in itself tells any honest person the who and how of the assassination's control.
What should we expect next from this source? A book entitled 'George Bush - Mastermind of 9-11'???
Albert,
Please identify these correspondents and the provenance of their comments.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene