Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Fetzer Challenge
#26
Dawn Meredith Wrote:
Albert Doyle Wrote:Switching topics is a bad sign.


You underestimate the powers that be. They simply don't wait around and see who gets elected. This statement itself is inherently self-exposing. They are king makers and get involved in the process long before the election. You grossly underestimate their ability by denying them the guiding influence they exert long before any election. It's more than obvious Johnson suddenly ends up on the Kennedy ticket exactly because of the pre-emptive involvement of those powers. Using Hoover's dirt should be the obvious modus operandi of the players involved that it was. Nixon was supposed to be elected not JFK. Those powers eventually got Nixon in. Johnson was a bridge and no bridge-maker. It's pretty simple.

Jack Ruby fingered Johnson because Johnson was the highest level in the chain of command visible to him in his interface with the conspirators - but in no way does that prove Johnson was the mastermind. Again, pretty simple stuff.

I agree. And keep in mind that Ruby also told Warren that "a whole new form of government" would take over. LBJ being prez does not constitute this. To believe the confession of a guy like E Howard is also misguided in my opinion. Notwitstanding that back when the CIA- or Nixon- killed his wife I thought he'd someday give a real deathbed confession. People like him take their secrets to the grave. I find the confession interesting certainly...but not conclusory. Jim you always avoid the issue of who killed MKL amd RFK? I admit outright that I am pretty ignorant on the issue of the alteration of the Z film. I see it as a rabbit hole. Same as trying to decide how many bullets. EVERY person on this forum agrees that JFK was killed by a conspiracy. Period. To argue side issues is to give the conspirators just what they want: the community spinning its wheels, sparring over who's theroy is most correct..while the years pass and the cover up continues. Now close to 50 years. Why can't we instead unite on a common goal of getting the truth of conspiracy out there, regardless of who is in the doorway, or what films or photos are authentic? Stick to the KISS method. WC gave us the innane MBT. Most Americans do not even know what that means. Or why. And why it matters, what JFK was trying to accomplish. Those to me are the saliant issues. Not rabbit holes. Isues of life and death of planet earth.
Nuclear war. Thirteen days. Peace with Russia and Cuba, the end of Viet Nam and the Cold War. The myth of the free press. The myth that presidents are "free" to lead. etc etc.

Dawn

I totally agree with you Dawn.
But we should all be careful as the 50th anniversary is approaching.
Beware of agents provocateurs that will intensify their attacks on DPF.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The Fetzer Challenge - by Charles Drago - 09-01-2012, 04:41 PM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Greg Burnham - 09-01-2012, 05:57 PM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Seamus Coogan - 09-01-2012, 06:31 PM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Vasilios Vazakas - 09-01-2012, 09:11 PM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Charles Drago - 09-01-2012, 10:29 PM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Greg Burnham - 10-01-2012, 02:32 AM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Charles Drago - 10-01-2012, 04:33 AM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Greg Burnham - 10-01-2012, 05:59 AM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Phil Dragoo - 10-01-2012, 06:14 AM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Greg Burnham - 10-01-2012, 06:28 AM
The Fetzer Challenge - by James H. Fetzer - 11-01-2012, 12:02 AM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Charles Drago - 11-01-2012, 02:54 AM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Greg Burnham - 11-01-2012, 03:44 AM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Seamus Coogan - 11-01-2012, 04:44 AM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Charles Drago - 11-01-2012, 04:55 AM
The Fetzer Challenge - by LR Trotter - 11-01-2012, 05:19 AM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Greg Burnham - 11-01-2012, 06:21 AM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Greg Burnham - 11-01-2012, 06:36 AM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Vasilios Vazakas - 11-01-2012, 01:20 PM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Charles Drago - 11-01-2012, 03:27 PM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Albert Doyle - 11-01-2012, 07:12 PM
The Fetzer Challenge - by James H. Fetzer - 11-01-2012, 08:40 PM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Albert Doyle - 11-01-2012, 10:02 PM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Dawn Meredith - 11-01-2012, 10:41 PM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Greg Burnham - 12-01-2012, 02:22 AM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Vasilios Vazakas - 12-01-2012, 08:52 AM
The Fetzer Challenge - by Bernice Moore - 14-01-2012, 05:36 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  DPF Bans Professor James H. Fetzer: The Rationale The Moderators 69 365,680 04-04-2020, 09:01 AM
Last Post: Mark A. O'Blazney
  Help spread prof. Newman's jfk vietnam debate challenge re pbs ken burns koch funded vietnam doc Nathaniel Heidenheimer 0 2,680 23-08-2017, 10:16 PM
Last Post: Nathaniel Heidenheimer
  Challenge Alan Ford 100 43,936 07-04-2016, 01:29 PM
Last Post: Drew Phipps
  The Decline and Fall of Jim Fetzer Jim DiEugenio 132 71,036 18-03-2016, 06:51 PM
Last Post: Richard Coleman
  Sunstein Challenge Albert Doyle 8 4,975 03-03-2015, 04:40 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  Mathematical Challenge re: CE 399 Bob Prudhomme 17 7,998 06-04-2014, 07:31 PM
Last Post: Bob Prudhomme
  New book by former NY Times reporter to challenge investigation of JFK assassination Magda Hassan 6 5,421 11-07-2013, 07:37 PM
Last Post: Albert Rossi
  From James Fetzer's Group - for those interested Adele Edisen 5 3,639 08-06-2013, 12:47 AM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  Fetzer gets a listing in Urban Dictionary: 'Fetzering' is a term for talking balls. Seamus Coogan 83 21,933 26-03-2013, 11:24 PM
Last Post: John Mooney
  The Palamara, "Doyle," Fetzer, and Jeffries Dust-Ups: The Simple Reason Why Charles Drago 4 4,102 20-02-2013, 07:15 PM
Last Post: Charles Drago

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)