10-02-2012, 03:04 PM
Think of this thread as a last-ditch effort to make lemonade from the foul and bitter lemon that has been the Doorway Man/Altgens 6 "discussion" here on DPF.
On another forum, Jim Fetzer posed the following question: "What is the probability that the Altgens [6] would have been altered UNLESS IT INCLUDED SOMETHING THAT IT SHOULD NOT HAVE INCLUDED?" [emphasis in the original]
Based upon my decades-long study of deep political science, my response is, "Very high."
Thus the following syllogism:
The Facilitators of the JFK assassination cover-up place the highest values on tactics that confuse, misdirect, and create cognitive dissonance and internecine conflict within the JFK critical community.
Obvious, designed-to-be-discovered alterations of evidence that neither supports nor refutes the pro-conspiracy argument is likely to engender confusion, misdirection, cognitive dissonance and internecine conflict within the JFK critical community.
Therefore there is a very high probability that Facilitators of the JFK assassination cover-up have altered evidence that neither supports nor refutes the pro-conspiracy argument.
On another forum, Jim Fetzer posed the following question: "What is the probability that the Altgens [6] would have been altered UNLESS IT INCLUDED SOMETHING THAT IT SHOULD NOT HAVE INCLUDED?" [emphasis in the original]
Based upon my decades-long study of deep political science, my response is, "Very high."
Thus the following syllogism:
The Facilitators of the JFK assassination cover-up place the highest values on tactics that confuse, misdirect, and create cognitive dissonance and internecine conflict within the JFK critical community.
Obvious, designed-to-be-discovered alterations of evidence that neither supports nor refutes the pro-conspiracy argument is likely to engender confusion, misdirection, cognitive dissonance and internecine conflict within the JFK critical community.
Therefore there is a very high probability that Facilitators of the JFK assassination cover-up have altered evidence that neither supports nor refutes the pro-conspiracy argument.