01-04-2012, 06:29 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-04-2012, 06:52 PM by Seamus Coogan.)
Dawn it puzzles me how you cannot see how frustrating the previous exchanges were for myself.
They started off in good humor but got progressively nastier. The nastiness and the inaccuracies had nothing to do with me.
However, I guess thats as good as an apology I am going to get lol. I guess Jim and Lisa should also be grateful.
But once again what part of that last post of mine did you not get?
Dawn, you have now gone from (A) Saying I should write a book about JFK Jr to put my money were my mouth is (B) Then accusing me of lying about not writing anything on CTKA concerning JFK/Hankey. Then to © Accusing me of denying that I wrote JFK II. Which you then (D) Used to justify your criticism of me for Hankeys JFK Jr piece. If that's not all bizarre enough, you are now rather clearly saying IMO that I am rallying against anyone who has ever had a differing opinion on JFK Jr!!! Nope that is totally untrue. I would like to read the work of Greg B and the others you mention. Lisa is not the last word, but she's the only one I have really had the chance to read on the topic. I also know she dislikes Hankeys take. I posted her comments as evidence of this. Very simple stuff okay.
I would just like the JFK Jr stuff to be removed to another thread. Further, I don't want any mention of my name to do with the subject to be in it. Considering how hard it is to dissuade people from their obsession with myself and JFK Jr, I really would dig it if the mods could help me out here. The inability of some people to argue the merits of quantity versus quality in this debate in a dedicated thread are rather concerning.
They started off in good humor but got progressively nastier. The nastiness and the inaccuracies had nothing to do with me.
However, I guess thats as good as an apology I am going to get lol. I guess Jim and Lisa should also be grateful.
But once again what part of that last post of mine did you not get?
Dawn, you have now gone from (A) Saying I should write a book about JFK Jr to put my money were my mouth is (B) Then accusing me of lying about not writing anything on CTKA concerning JFK/Hankey. Then to © Accusing me of denying that I wrote JFK II. Which you then (D) Used to justify your criticism of me for Hankeys JFK Jr piece. If that's not all bizarre enough, you are now rather clearly saying IMO that I am rallying against anyone who has ever had a differing opinion on JFK Jr!!! Nope that is totally untrue. I would like to read the work of Greg B and the others you mention. Lisa is not the last word, but she's the only one I have really had the chance to read on the topic. I also know she dislikes Hankeys take. I posted her comments as evidence of this. Very simple stuff okay.
I would just like the JFK Jr stuff to be removed to another thread. Further, I don't want any mention of my name to do with the subject to be in it. Considering how hard it is to dissuade people from their obsession with myself and JFK Jr, I really would dig it if the mods could help me out here. The inability of some people to argue the merits of quantity versus quality in this debate in a dedicated thread are rather concerning.
"In the Kennedy assassination we must be careful of running off into the ether of our own imaginations." Carl Ogelsby circa 1992