06-04-2012, 03:30 AM
Ed Jewett Wrote:There's nothing fallacious about it, Mr. Doyle. The issue is addressed in the films. Your request sentence is littered with presumptions or poor assumptions. The simplest of answers is that some of the footage or background could have been shot in advance of the event for use or insertion during the event and its broadcast, movies, or media coverage. Or perhaps some of the technical capabilities are inherent in the military tools of WESCAM, or "black budget/weaponry" tools of animation, simulation, computer graphics, etc.
With all due respect, that's abject lunacy that doesn't answer the point. You see the things you mention could not have been done with persons who took video, showed it to their friends privately, and then had their friends witness planes in the videos hitting the Towers. This event had the unique circumstance of the first plane causing people to break out their video cameras and start video-ing. This means that many people caught the impact into the south Tower on video. Therefore there were numerous cases where people showed their videos to others privately and those people saw images of a plane flying into the Tower. These videos could not have been altered because they were always in the possession of the video-er who was completely unknown to grand alteration intel command.
Pretty soon the will be a Fetzer cult of people standing on a mountain waiting for a comet to end the world.