06-04-2012, 08:04 PM
Lauren Johnson Wrote:Jan Klimkowski Wrote:Ed - as usual, I see a lot of scattergun noise and a lack of any critical evaluation from you.
Once again, which of these hypotheses - the use of computer generated images (CGI), the use of video compositing (VC), or the use of holograms - do you consider credible in the WTC context?
Jan, the argument goes like this. Since these are the only three possibilities, and since real, live, non-hologram witnesses saw planes crash into the buildings, obviously, one is obliged to choose option three. What a crock.
You have their names, addresses, affidavits, testimony, links, attributed sources, and assurance/assistance to the fact that they are open to counter-inquiry and cross-examination, I assume.
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"