Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The plane crashes of 9/11 were fabrications . . .
#31
Charles Drago Wrote:
Ed Jewett Wrote:
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:
Charles Drago Wrote:All intelligence operations have at least two objectives.

One of the 9-11 objectives is observed on this thread.

And that is precisely why I am insisting that those who propose the "video fakery proves no planes hit the Twin Towers" hypothesis produce some credible evidence to support their claims.

Otherwise, it is just diversionary garbage which can be used by the ruling elites to discredit deep political analysis of 9/11.

And here you are having a discussion with another member of the executive group with whom you undoubtedly share alignment and agreement on mission in which you use the same dismissive language of "diversionary garbage" and then offer some pablum like "the ruling elite" without specificity. (It's roughly akin to Orling's TPB.)

Ed,

Have you lost control of your senses?

"Executive group"???

"Undoubtedly share alignment"???

What's happened to you?

Charles

Charles

Ah, Charles... I see you have awoken, at least long enough to lob another ad hominem vaguely aligned with an allegation of psychiatric or psychological deficiency or dysfunction.

Who runs the Deep Politics Forum, Charles? Who calls the shots? Who are the administrator, the moderators, etc.? Who makes the decisions? It is an enterprise, by any defintiion. It has a mission, its own web site, the software and bandwith necessary to that, the costs inherent to that...

Or perhaps it runs on its own and has been robotized?

Back-channel communications among that leadership have been stipulated. One of you is referred to as a "sensai" (though perhaps I am misinterpreting that as a mis-spelled word).

This question (not of "plane or "no plane", but of 9/11 as a whole) is the essential deep political question of the moment. ... decade... future.

And the leadership (stipulated) behind the mission statement on the front page has consistently failed to acknowledge or address the obvious. Or even debate its obviousness. Or even acknowledge its presence. The big hairy smelly elephant on a rampage....

***

I'll have to withdraw from any more responses for the moment; it's a long Easter weekend already pre-secheduled for five separate events.
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The plane crashes of 9/11 were fabrications . . . - by Ed Jewett - 06-04-2012, 08:42 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  UK plane crash kills members of bin Laden family, police say Drew Phipps 1 3,545 02-08-2015, 05:38 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Reported Airspeed of Plane Into WTC Impossible - Must Have Been Drone or Lie! Peter Lemkin 0 2,609 17-02-2014, 09:25 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The 9/11 Mystery Plane and the Vanishing of America Peter Lemkin 9 7,206 06-10-2012, 03:31 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Pentagon Employee Says Plane Did Not Crash into Building Jack White 11 7,781 25-09-2011, 02:16 PM
Last Post: Bernice Moore
  Full On: Plane / No Plane and other Anomalies Debate re: the Pentagon Attack Peter Lemkin 0 2,583 05-02-2011, 09:00 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Plane Speeds Were Not Possible.....Only A Fiction Peter Lemkin 12 17,791 23-08-2010, 08:40 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)