18-06-2012, 03:01 PM
I see something very different from Lemkin. He can't see any demolition explosion. What he thinks are demo explosions is the over pressure of the collapsing floors. destroying and forcing out the contents of each floor just AHEAD of the crush front. The collapse of a huge tower is very violent and involves lots of energy and chaos. What else would you expect?
The columns SURVIVED the floor collapse fell away AFTER the floor collapse stripped away the required bracing to hold them up... and without that bracing the columns toppled... the facade fell way and the core fell down... some of it toppling over. There is not a shred of evidence in ANY core or facade column found to indicate it was the victim of an explosion.
If Mr. Lemkin or any cite an image of an "exploded" column remains from the debris... by all means. There are thousands of those columns in the debris photos and all you need to do is find ONE which shows irrefutable signs of explosions. But of course Lemkin claims all the columns were exploded apart. All speculation. All based on his wishful thinking and poor observations... and lack of engineering and physics knowledge.
The columns SURVIVED the floor collapse fell away AFTER the floor collapse stripped away the required bracing to hold them up... and without that bracing the columns toppled... the facade fell way and the core fell down... some of it toppling over. There is not a shred of evidence in ANY core or facade column found to indicate it was the victim of an explosion.
If Mr. Lemkin or any cite an image of an "exploded" column remains from the debris... by all means. There are thousands of those columns in the debris photos and all you need to do is find ONE which shows irrefutable signs of explosions. But of course Lemkin claims all the columns were exploded apart. All speculation. All based on his wishful thinking and poor observations... and lack of engineering and physics knowledge.