18-06-2012, 07:55 PM
(This post was last modified: 19-06-2012, 01:41 AM by Jeffrey Orling.)
Ed,
The dog ate my homework.
The site was cleaned up. Some of the steel etc. was saved for study. Do you think it was practical to save 1.8 million tons of debris?
We do have hundreds if not thousands of photos of the steel... on the pile... before it was touched. Show me one piece of steel which has the unmistakable signs of explosive destruction... show me one piece that's melted on that pile.
The collapse, WOULD generate enormous quantity of heat from the friction of grinding and pulverizing all the materials. Mechanical destruction PRODUCES heat and it's possible that it could have been concentrated and produced the NASA infared data. Can you prove it wouldn't? Can you falsify the statement that the destruction of 90,000 tons of concrete from grinding and abrasion would not produce heat?
How do you explain the origin of the heat which drove the billowing clouds after all three collapses way up into the sky?
Explain it in scienfitic terms.
If you can't explain the process then you can't draw a conclusion. Enough of the black box and the dog ate my homework explanations.
If you can't explain it.. then get one of your experts to... because I haven't read anyone explain much of anything.
Inquiring Minds Want to Know.
Jeffrey
The dog ate my homework.
The site was cleaned up. Some of the steel etc. was saved for study. Do you think it was practical to save 1.8 million tons of debris?
We do have hundreds if not thousands of photos of the steel... on the pile... before it was touched. Show me one piece of steel which has the unmistakable signs of explosive destruction... show me one piece that's melted on that pile.
The collapse, WOULD generate enormous quantity of heat from the friction of grinding and pulverizing all the materials. Mechanical destruction PRODUCES heat and it's possible that it could have been concentrated and produced the NASA infared data. Can you prove it wouldn't? Can you falsify the statement that the destruction of 90,000 tons of concrete from grinding and abrasion would not produce heat?
How do you explain the origin of the heat which drove the billowing clouds after all three collapses way up into the sky?
Explain it in scienfitic terms.
If you can't explain the process then you can't draw a conclusion. Enough of the black box and the dog ate my homework explanations.
If you can't explain it.. then get one of your experts to... because I haven't read anyone explain much of anything.
Inquiring Minds Want to Know.
Jeffrey