26-06-2012, 02:54 AM
From #46:
I select this as an exemplar of the omnipotence attributed to Israel:
Israel receives unquestioned massive funding and never loses a political decision from the US government. It brags about being in control of the US government and enjoys the most powerful lobby in history occupying a main position of control within that government. It now has the US government fighting a war crime-induced war for regional control in the Middle East.
I see the disparate philosophies of Zbigniew Brzezinski and Robert Gates (representing Carter and Bush) in their coauthorship of the 2004 Council on Foreign Relations paper "Iran: Time for a New Approach." They counsel negotiation.
CIA installed the Shah. Carter saw to it that the Ayatollah ascended. Can this benefit Israel? How?
This week's Foreign Affairs cover Why Iran Should Get the Bomb by Kenneth Waltz posits balancing Israel's weapons with Iran's:
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/1...t-the-bomb
By what magical potency has Israel arranged this?
Putin publicly announces he has warned off Israel from any attack on Iranhe does this in front of his flexible friend Barry the Chicago Mufti.
Barry and Hillary exclude Israel from the counterterrorism conference.
Their recent campaign has used CIA and NATO to remove secular regimes and replace them with Islamist ones. In Egypt the winner proclaims sharia, jihad, dying for Islam, and warrants a congratulatory call from Barry.
Proclamations of Israel as the dominatrix of nation states to the contrary notwithstanding, it appears the shots are called elsewhere.
Allegations Israel sponsored the assassination of the 35[SUP]th[/SUP] president wouldin light of subsequent sublime work by George Michael Evica, L. Fletcher Prouty, Peter Dale Scott and James Douglass (to name four)of necessity imply it still calls the shots.
It is in the nature of the sponsor to be the prime mover transcending nations, religions, politics, which are merely leaves moving in its wind.
There is more than a little zen here: the sponsor who can be named cannot be the true sponsor for precisely the reason that it is the unseen (unspeakable) wielder of power.
The case against Israel rests on obsession rather than demonstrable proofs.
Observing the decades of Rockefeller interests manipulating the economic battlefield in South America using U.S. diplomacy, CIA dirty tricks, Green Beret combatants and advisors, through assassination, insurgency, pacification shows an exercise of power on the scale necessary to obtain sponsorship.
The point being that the power is not Communism, nor fascism, nor Islam, nor Zionism, that all of these and more serve the interest of the sponsor.
Removing Saddam Hussein to replace him with an Islamist state does not benefit Israel, but it may benefit either or both Saudi Arabia and Iran.
In Afghanistan, building sand castles for ten years will benefit arms manufacturers and heroin smugglers, but leaves Pakistan in place like the evening tide.
Israel served as a destination for those Hitler wished to relocate, whom the Grand Mufti and Himmler sought to exterminate.
It has survived but hardly as the Professor Moriarty of London's web of crime.
I look at somebody like David Rockefeller. When Henry Kissinger whispers something about Vietnamese oil. About Kennedy's obstruction.
And they say Marcello said take the stone out of my shoe.
The silver train is going to run.
It's got no insignia, symbol or emblem.
Swastika, hammer & sickle, Star of David, corporate logo, or sanitized, don't be on the tracksthere will be blood.
I select this as an exemplar of the omnipotence attributed to Israel:
Israel receives unquestioned massive funding and never loses a political decision from the US government. It brags about being in control of the US government and enjoys the most powerful lobby in history occupying a main position of control within that government. It now has the US government fighting a war crime-induced war for regional control in the Middle East.
I see the disparate philosophies of Zbigniew Brzezinski and Robert Gates (representing Carter and Bush) in their coauthorship of the 2004 Council on Foreign Relations paper "Iran: Time for a New Approach." They counsel negotiation.
CIA installed the Shah. Carter saw to it that the Ayatollah ascended. Can this benefit Israel? How?
This week's Foreign Affairs cover Why Iran Should Get the Bomb by Kenneth Waltz posits balancing Israel's weapons with Iran's:
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/1...t-the-bomb
By what magical potency has Israel arranged this?
Putin publicly announces he has warned off Israel from any attack on Iranhe does this in front of his flexible friend Barry the Chicago Mufti.
Barry and Hillary exclude Israel from the counterterrorism conference.
Their recent campaign has used CIA and NATO to remove secular regimes and replace them with Islamist ones. In Egypt the winner proclaims sharia, jihad, dying for Islam, and warrants a congratulatory call from Barry.
Proclamations of Israel as the dominatrix of nation states to the contrary notwithstanding, it appears the shots are called elsewhere.
Allegations Israel sponsored the assassination of the 35[SUP]th[/SUP] president wouldin light of subsequent sublime work by George Michael Evica, L. Fletcher Prouty, Peter Dale Scott and James Douglass (to name four)of necessity imply it still calls the shots.
It is in the nature of the sponsor to be the prime mover transcending nations, religions, politics, which are merely leaves moving in its wind.
There is more than a little zen here: the sponsor who can be named cannot be the true sponsor for precisely the reason that it is the unseen (unspeakable) wielder of power.
The case against Israel rests on obsession rather than demonstrable proofs.
Observing the decades of Rockefeller interests manipulating the economic battlefield in South America using U.S. diplomacy, CIA dirty tricks, Green Beret combatants and advisors, through assassination, insurgency, pacification shows an exercise of power on the scale necessary to obtain sponsorship.
The point being that the power is not Communism, nor fascism, nor Islam, nor Zionism, that all of these and more serve the interest of the sponsor.
Removing Saddam Hussein to replace him with an Islamist state does not benefit Israel, but it may benefit either or both Saudi Arabia and Iran.
In Afghanistan, building sand castles for ten years will benefit arms manufacturers and heroin smugglers, but leaves Pakistan in place like the evening tide.
Israel served as a destination for those Hitler wished to relocate, whom the Grand Mufti and Himmler sought to exterminate.
It has survived but hardly as the Professor Moriarty of London's web of crime.
I look at somebody like David Rockefeller. When Henry Kissinger whispers something about Vietnamese oil. About Kennedy's obstruction.
And they say Marcello said take the stone out of my shoe.
The silver train is going to run.
It's got no insignia, symbol or emblem.
Swastika, hammer & sickle, Star of David, corporate logo, or sanitized, don't be on the tracksthere will be blood.