Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[Magda Hassan]

Why is there such strong aversion to the very mention of Israeli involvement in the JFK assassination? Can we really deny that even in 1963 there was a tremendous vested interest on the part of the American elite to maintain and support a strong Israel? Certainly, JFK's opposition to the Israeli nuclear program wouldn't have been the primary impetus behind his assassination, but it could have been one of many contributing factors.

I don't think any one has 'such an aversion to the very mention' of it Don. As you can see the thread is quite long. it is being mentioned and mentioned and mentioned. Ad nauseum. The point is, does Israel stand up to scrutiny as a viable sponsor of the assassination? No. They had their nuclear material and there was nothing Kennedy could do. Israel was strategically important for the US (and others) and no one was going to ever leave them to be taken over by the Arabs especially Arabs under the Soviet auspices. Were there Jews involved in the assassination? Yes. Were there Cubans involved in the assassination? Yes. Doesn't mean their respective countries were the sponsors behind the assassination. The sponsors are above nation states. Why didn't Israel kill Vanunu who was a much bigger real threat to Israel than Kennedy could ever hope to be?