Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

[Peter Lemkin]

Sorry but I can't help myself.

From another forum:
Peter,

The authors of the paper you have quoted have - in the 911 regard - a reputation for avoiding peer review of their papers. When they have had such material peer reviewed, it has been unanimously rejected.
Can you advise us when the paper will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal such as:
[URL="http://pubs.acs.org/journal/achre4?cookieSet=1"]
[/URL]Accounts of Chemical Research


Journal of the Amerciian Chemical Society

Journal of Chemical Physics


etc?

The authors of the paper you have quoted have - in the 911 regard - a reputation for avoiding peer review of their papers. When they have had such material peer reviewed, it has been unanimously rejected.

Please tell me that this is not the same moderator (from another forum) who banned Jan from posting unless Jan agreed that the moderator could 'rewrite' his post because Jan rightly questioned the extremely dubious piece of psyop crap masquerading as a 'Peer Reviewed' 911 journal of another member there ??? WTF!!! Does this person know about peer review of any kind? Does he know which way is up? He can't be serious?

Some people should stick to pulling legs off fleas.

Now if only it had been 'peer reviewed' in that journal manufactured by that boy from Brazil. Everyone would be happy.

He's a 'good' Aussie Soldier and you should be proud of him - he's even an officer in your Navy, with an undisclosed security clearance, and flyboy. He's apparently gotten the mission or taken it upon himself to bomb all coherant information on 911 out of the 'waters' by whatever means necessary. For further laughs look at his and my exchanges - though he is way out of his depths on this one.....way, way, way.......