08-04-2009, 09:33 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-04-2009, 02:48 AM by Charles Drago.)
Peter,
I too was a regular contributor to that site. And I'm proud to take partial credit for exposing the cover identity of which I've written as just that -- a vessel in which representatives of the national security state travel to debunk and otherwise disrupt legitimate efforts to expose deep political operations to the light of day.
On that forum I demonstrated how the cover identity is used by writers of widely divergent literary and cognitive abilities simply by posting a side-by-side comparison of the identity's then-recent offerings.
The cover identity himself, by the way, is the son of a scientist who aided and abetted Big Tobacco in their conspiracy to poison the world.
Another ham-handed agent provocateur who -- believe it or not -- enjoys moderator status on that forum is a member of the Australian military. He has been known to spend scores of hours per week monitoring the Deep Politics Forum, and I can't believe that he's capable of doing so exclusively on his own time. So he's either commiting actionable offenses against his employer's rules, or he is acting under orders. It's that simple.
Like the son of Big Tobacco, the moderator seems to have instant -- that's the key -- access to a vast database not commonly available to everyman.
The forum is owned by two individuals. One of them, as I posted earlier, is a congenital liar and an intellectual coward. On two occasions he has attempted to engage me in battles of wits and ideas, has been soundly thrashed, and has responded by erasing my posts and/or locking the threads.
His most recent perfidy: He has arranged for my computer to be banned from accessing his forum even as he publicly claims otherwise. On two occasions I posted from a friend's computer; then suddenly it too was banned.
The other owner, I am pained to note, is a man I once thought to be honorable and who, in the spirit of full disclosure, has done important work on behalf of the truth. But his silent acquiescence to his partner's treachery is nothing short of damning.
I stand with Jan in not wanting to distract readers of our forum with a running dialogue against the other Internet venture. But I can assure you that the agents provocateurs who have deeply penetrated that site regularly monitor these pages, so I'll take this opportunity to send a message their way:
We see you ...
I too was a regular contributor to that site. And I'm proud to take partial credit for exposing the cover identity of which I've written as just that -- a vessel in which representatives of the national security state travel to debunk and otherwise disrupt legitimate efforts to expose deep political operations to the light of day.
On that forum I demonstrated how the cover identity is used by writers of widely divergent literary and cognitive abilities simply by posting a side-by-side comparison of the identity's then-recent offerings.
The cover identity himself, by the way, is the son of a scientist who aided and abetted Big Tobacco in their conspiracy to poison the world.
Another ham-handed agent provocateur who -- believe it or not -- enjoys moderator status on that forum is a member of the Australian military. He has been known to spend scores of hours per week monitoring the Deep Politics Forum, and I can't believe that he's capable of doing so exclusively on his own time. So he's either commiting actionable offenses against his employer's rules, or he is acting under orders. It's that simple.
Like the son of Big Tobacco, the moderator seems to have instant -- that's the key -- access to a vast database not commonly available to everyman.
The forum is owned by two individuals. One of them, as I posted earlier, is a congenital liar and an intellectual coward. On two occasions he has attempted to engage me in battles of wits and ideas, has been soundly thrashed, and has responded by erasing my posts and/or locking the threads.
His most recent perfidy: He has arranged for my computer to be banned from accessing his forum even as he publicly claims otherwise. On two occasions I posted from a friend's computer; then suddenly it too was banned.
The other owner, I am pained to note, is a man I once thought to be honorable and who, in the spirit of full disclosure, has done important work on behalf of the truth. But his silent acquiescence to his partner's treachery is nothing short of damning.
I stand with Jan in not wanting to distract readers of our forum with a running dialogue against the other Internet venture. But I can assure you that the agents provocateurs who have deeply penetrated that site regularly monitor these pages, so I'll take this opportunity to send a message their way:
We see you ...