09-10-2012, 03:06 PM
Dawn
I will accept your word that Marty has and had noble intentions when he wrote the book. I also admire Salandria and if it was not
for him, we would have still be in the dark about many things.
However, even the most noble intations can spread the wrong message if they are not written carefully.
I assume his book is read by a wide audience, not just people with knowledge about the assassination but regular people
who have not a clue about JFK and his policies or his assassination.
If an unsuspected mind reads this dialogue will believe that JFK was some kind of Communist who betrayed his people, the democratic
way and freedom. An unsuspected mind will believe that it was JFK who acted aginst people's free will, like Russia Communists
always knew what it was best for the people. A distorted free will that gives people the rigth to blow up the planet if they desire.
Dulles justified the blow up thing by saying, that if we deprive them of that right then what's the difference between us and Communists.
That JFK gave up the right of the people to lead the country, and instead transferred the right to an elite with the power to manipulate
the media.
An unsuspected mind will not know that what Dulles accuses JFK, is something that Dulles and the people he represents are an elite who took control
over people, manipulated the media (Mockingbird) and covered up the assassination for 40 years.
And while Dulles champions the right of democracy and free will, an unsuspected mind would not know that it was Dulles who generated
coup d'etat in foreign countries against a foreign's people will, just because an elite desired. And yet he has the nerve to accuse JFK for this.
An unsuspected mind will side with Dulles words once he finally sees JFK to agree and asks for forgiveness.
So i still think that no matter his noble intentions he passed the wrong message, unwittingly i would like to think.
I will accept your word that Marty has and had noble intentions when he wrote the book. I also admire Salandria and if it was not
for him, we would have still be in the dark about many things.
However, even the most noble intations can spread the wrong message if they are not written carefully.
I assume his book is read by a wide audience, not just people with knowledge about the assassination but regular people
who have not a clue about JFK and his policies or his assassination.
If an unsuspected mind reads this dialogue will believe that JFK was some kind of Communist who betrayed his people, the democratic
way and freedom. An unsuspected mind will believe that it was JFK who acted aginst people's free will, like Russia Communists
always knew what it was best for the people. A distorted free will that gives people the rigth to blow up the planet if they desire.
Dulles justified the blow up thing by saying, that if we deprive them of that right then what's the difference between us and Communists.
That JFK gave up the right of the people to lead the country, and instead transferred the right to an elite with the power to manipulate
the media.
An unsuspected mind will not know that what Dulles accuses JFK, is something that Dulles and the people he represents are an elite who took control
over people, manipulated the media (Mockingbird) and covered up the assassination for 40 years.
And while Dulles champions the right of democracy and free will, an unsuspected mind would not know that it was Dulles who generated
coup d'etat in foreign countries against a foreign's people will, just because an elite desired. And yet he has the nerve to accuse JFK for this.
An unsuspected mind will side with Dulles words once he finally sees JFK to agree and asks for forgiveness.
So i still think that no matter his noble intentions he passed the wrong message, unwittingly i would like to think.