Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[David Josephs]

I would think that would be in the Ben-Gurion biography David. You write paragraphs worth of filler, David, but they end up being answered by one or two lines. I'm sure the Ben-Gurion biography confirms this. Piper is well footnoted, so I'm sure that's where he got it. Surely you're not trying to deny this is an accurate description of Ben-Gurion's behavior at the time?




Now let's run over your position once again. You are contending that although this is already well-established in history and in books like those Mark and Piper list, you are saying this didn't occur and was the result of exaggerated accounts? What you are saying is even though there is plenty of evidence Ben-Gurion and JFK were at serious loggerheads over the nuclear issue and Ben-Gurion was witnessed as having a mental breakdown over it, that this is completely unrelated and coincidence and the product of wishful thinking on Hersh's and Piper's behalf? Even though you have no counter explanation for what caused this or why the letters were classified? Hmm.

Also, you are saying that although the persons of deep enough power in America to get involved with the CIA/Cuban nexus could not be unrelated to the assassination cabal that this had nothing to do with anything and the "new jew backers" were altruistically doing a favor for only the Cubans - even though they had major issues that were all directly satisfied by JFK's assassination and proven by Israel's gains following it?

I just want to get your position clear because I'm honestly seeking the truth here..


Oh yeah, I forgot. Also, even though you are admitting involvement that has gotten others excoriated and vilified you are not doing so, while doing so, while saying you are trying to disprove it. You're admitting Israel was involved just like many other interests but wasn't involved?


I'm just trying to clarify your position.


.

So again Albert... you just can't point to anything in that letter that justifies your conclusion, can you?

Clarify YOUR position with support... the Letter is right there Albert... point to the passages thatsupport you previous post... why do you run from that?


My position remains that you and Mark are not prepared to post the actual evidence... only references to them and hopes we go find them ourselves.
and when we do, we find them horribly inadequate to support the conclusion.

My position is that the players Piper names are part of a world wide illegal activites cabal and in the event of an assasination THEY are on the top of the list to be examined...
Piper and you are stating that Ben-Gurion's anger at the letter I posted above led to JFK's assassination...

Pure BS boys... PROVE your conclusion before questioning everyone else's,

unless you simply can't...
which usually results in ad hominem and the changing of the subject from YOUR story to everybody else's objections... as we've seen in EVERY reponse in this thread