Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[Albert Doyle]

You know, there's no documentation for what was written in The Unspeakable and Douglass got it all wrong.

'Nuf said Albert.... if you're in a position to claim Unspeakable is wrong... you simply don't GET it and my time is being wated in discussion with you.

"You aint gonna learn what you dont wanna know....."

Thank you for your posts... they make very clear where you stand and what you feel is adequate as supporting documentation for a conclusion...

Finally, LEARN how to use the forum... really not that hard... if you can't take the time to investigate how to work this simple tool
what does that say about how far you WONT GO in investigating your posted conclusions - which is a bit more complicated than changing font color.

Don't be offended if I ignore this thread and your posts on this subject.... posting with you and Mark is like discussing Oswald's innocence with Bugliosi and Posner...

Bad assumptions leading to worse conclusions.... and that doe-eyed stare of, "huh?, what do you mean my evidence is pathetically lacking? it's obvious that Oswald did it alone...."

yes Albert... you are painfully obvious.

A fool who is so bent on deception that he fails to understand sarcasm or the context in which it is written.


In case you need it explained to you, what I was saying is YOUR arguments are in extreme contrast and contradiction to what Douglass was showing in his landmark book The Unspeakable. The fact you don't understand that says a lot about your input here.

Again, if you need this spelled-out you are offering arguments that casually ignore how Kennedy's restriction on Israeli nuclear weapon development was right in line with everything Douglass showed him to be doing in The Unspeakable.

David, you're not fooling anyone with this stuff and your aggressive attempt to seize authority here is not concealing the fact you are flagrantly ignoring the main points and also dishonestly failing to admit when you are wrong.

This debate is just David's attempt to reduce this to the pissing contest material he tries to shift the issues to. In the end he hasn't honestly answered the operative points like the bricking-over of the elevator at Dimona.

In light of this your patronizing "teaching" above is laughable considering how badly you are losing this debate and how foolish a gaffe your accusing me of claiming Unspeakable was wrong is. Like Mark said, you are looking more and more ridiculous.

To the contrary, what I am clearly saying above is that Unspeakable is profoundly right. And because it is therefore your casual denial of Kennedy's restriction of Israeli nuclear weapons is in unjustifiable contrast to it. Indeed The Unspeakable backs what Piper is saying. Your material runs counter to it. So, really, the person who is saying Douglass is wrong is YOU!


Ask David to honestly answer, if Kennedy was seeking a nuclear ban treaty with the Soviets at American University, does he think it would make it more likely or less likely that he would extend that to include the Israelis?