23-10-2012, 09:29 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:David Josephs Wrote::lol:
Thanks Albert... the years at the DVP/McAdams' school of ad hominem have not been wasted on you...
I've lost and you've won. Cause of course THAT'S what we're all all here trying to do here... WIN...
And now you're claiming that Unspeakable BACKS Piper...
Here are two reviews - please copy and paste ANY REVIEW FROM ANYONE who can point to Unspeakable and this "BACKING" you talk of..
http://www.globalresearch.ca/jfk-and-the...ters/16273
http://www.ctka.net/reviews/jfk_unspeakable.html
I've read the book twice and have no idea what you are talking about....
Cite a page number - I'd be happy to look it up.
Speaking of WINNING....
Where are all the posts congratulating your efforts and aknowledging your contributions in support of Piper's book...
Does ANYONE HERE believe you've "WON" besides Mark??
I appreciate your admission that you were foolishly wrong in accusing me of saying Douglass was wrong. Your forthrightness goes a long way in showing your character and the honesty and integrity of your arguments.
Quick question David - I must have missed your reply as to why exactly the Israelis bricked-over the elevator at Dimona when Kennedy's inspectors visited?
You're flagrantly dodging David. (Which is why you've lost this debate)
Oh, any time - believe whatever it is you need to Albert... speaking of sarcasm missed... oy!
I respect a great number of the posters and researchers on this forum and from EF and Lancer before that...
Other than "anti-semitism" what are your reasons for not a single one of them agreeing with your and by deafualt Piper's assessment of the situation?
or at least giving it the least bit of credibility?
Jealousy maybe ??
Why the word "Israel" does not appear in a single review of Douglass' book - if this was such a central theme and the KEY to his assassination - how could they miss it so badly?
Albert... if claiming "victory" is the only way you can move forward with your life, claim it.
Anyone reading the thread and following the links and sources will find out for themselves.
I found Piper's book pporly constructed and filled with speculation and "would have's" and "could have's"... just like your posts.
Given that you've "solved" the case... is your purpose here only to "spread the word"... or put Piper's and your conclusion to the test of peer review?
The first requires zealous faith in the unproveable, while the latter has all the rest of us rolling our eyes...
Does ANYONE HERE agree with Piper's assessment?
{crickets chirping} :zzzz: