Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[Albert Doyle]

Thus it is not proved.

And all the pouting tears in the watercolor words have failed to show "Israel" performing any role in the assassination of JFK.

I would like Phil to explain how Angleton, who was manipulating Oswald's file and supplying nuclear materials behind Kennedy's back to Dimona, would stay out of complicity in Ben-Gurion's problem with JFK? Remember, Piper shows how Angleton was directly involved in the formation of Mossad and helped train its founding members how to be an intelligence agency. Having this much connection to both the nuclear issue that drove Ben-Gurion from office and the CIA end of the conspiracy, would it be likely Angleton wasn't involved? I would say we don't have proof in the same sense we don't have proof of any fence shooter in Dealey Plaza. Clearly this issue is one where some prefer a politically-motivated bias and others prefer the obvious facts. David, in his myopic zeal, will probably respond in outrage that I deny a fence shooter in Dealey Plaza, but it's pretty clear what's going on here.

Who were the "new jew backers" Echevarria was referring to and what was their purpose? David says Cuba and Cuba alone. I say Piper's evidence shows it was impossible for any backers to back Cuba at that depth and not be interlinked with the main assassination cabal. It is classic of CIA's plausible deniability modus operandi to bring this new backing in for Cuba while using it for another purpose that served the real sponsors. A purpose now fulfilled and embodied by today's world scene.

Sorry, Phil but "Israel" was the chosen term of Ben-Gurion when he said JFK threatened its future existence.


(I say this with respect to Phil who is like an angel whose wings flutter even further into the ether of truth than Douglass with his content and allusion-rich poetry)