06-11-2012, 06:06 PM
Mark,
Did you notice when you show David that CIA commonly calls its assets "Businessmen" he ignores it and doesn't answer? And the facilitator evidence as well.
(Here comes another long lecture that doesn't answer the point)
There's no point in pursuing this. There's a flagrant bias and double standard that makes any kind of objective analysis impossible in my opinion. I also think that more or less proves the validity of Piper's facilitator evidence. Again, in my opinion. The best thing Piper does is expose the Lansky/Rosenbaum/Swiss bank network that the critics universally avoid. This, once again, proves its validity, in my opinion.
Did you notice when you show David that CIA commonly calls its assets "Businessmen" he ignores it and doesn't answer? And the facilitator evidence as well.
(Here comes another long lecture that doesn't answer the point)
There's no point in pursuing this. There's a flagrant bias and double standard that makes any kind of objective analysis impossible in my opinion. I also think that more or less proves the validity of Piper's facilitator evidence. Again, in my opinion. The best thing Piper does is expose the Lansky/Rosenbaum/Swiss bank network that the critics universally avoid. This, once again, proves its validity, in my opinion.