Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[David Josephs]

We'll just let the posts speak for themselves "Albert"

I've stated my arguments, provided the links, quotes, Piper passages, actual history and the real story - not the Piper/Albert/Mark "use anti-semitism to defelct everything" argument.

Your BG "nervous breakdown" evidence is non-existent Al... Every passage you try to point to proves the opposite... and with JFK INCREASING FINANCIAL AID TO ISRAEL as I've shown and linked to...
Your arguments continue to grow weaker and weaker...

Your "FACTS" never check out, and your conclusions are built on your own strawman arguments...

and your "conclusions NEVER FAIL TO INCLUDE speculation of another's state of mind,

He (BG) probably knew exactly what Kennedy intended.


David, of course, has to erase this entire history that is the main argument of cutting-edge assassination researchers and authors like Douglass and DiEugenio. If you're sharp you'll see that David is subtly revising the center of power to Israel by posing it in terms of Israel calling the shots. It is that very impasse over who would have the say on Israeli nuclear weapons that caused the showdown with Kennedy. While avoiding the entire issue, David conveniently skips ahead and says it doesn't matter. In my opinion, what Piper shows proves otherwise, as does David's (and others) inability to answer it.

Nor do ever seem to learn a simple lesson... STOP TELLING ME AND OTHERS WHAT I THINK ALBERT...
concentrate on proving your point which you have failed so miserably at these last 20 pages

The only one not offering ANSWERS, SUPPORT, or a coherent argument is you and Mark....

You SAY things but you never actually quote the source... you "paraphrase" - why?
cause you know when the source is read the actual meaning will be revealed... so you hide it... real clever but you fool no one.
And then for you to bring up the names of two authors researchers who would NOT agree with you... one who already knew Piper for who he was...

Dude... you can have any opinion you want... I give a #$%.
What you can't do is fool intelligent people with rhetoric and misdirection.... I've encounter your kind of poster over the years MANY times...

they employ a simple trick... Tautology

Tautology in formal logic refers to a statement that must be true in every interpretation by its very construction. In rhetorical logic, it is an argument that utilizes circular reasoning, which means that the conclusion is also its own premise. Typically the premise is simply restated in the conclusion, without adding additional information or clarification. The structure of such arguments is A=B therefore A=B, although the premise and conclusion might be formulated differently so it is not immediately apparent as such. For example, saying that therapeutic touch works because it manipulates the life force is a tautology because the definition of therapeutic touch is the alleged manipulation (without touching) of the life force.

Anyone with an ounce of understanding in math, philosophy or logic sees thru you and these posts in a heartbeat...

.....
But other than that Mrs Kennedy, how did you like the limo ride?