Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[Charles Drago]

The most noticeable absence here is that of James DiEugenio. DiEugenio has a rare talent for detail and usually doesn't miss a stitch on this kind of matter. He said that Final Judgment was disinformation and that he tossed the book into the trash can where it belonged. However, having read DiEugenio I find that his particular method is to uproot and destroy any false work by means of its furthest-most sources and material. What is really noticeable here is he doesn't do that with Piper. In fact, if you read this thread, no one does it. This, along with the eye-blinks, as well as the trolling, should be evidence enough of Piper's validity - albeit a partial one due to his incorrect claim that Israel was perhaps the Sponsor.

Another classic agent provocateur move -- entice well-known/respected experts into a no-win exchange with a "'Colby/'Doyle'" entity whose brief is to distort, disinform, and deceive.

Again: The ONLY noble response to such an entity is comprised of a combination of exposure and ridicule.