Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[Charles Drago]

I wonder if Charles has any idea how most of his posts sound, at least to me. I used to send private messages to Jim Fetzer, trying gingerly to tell him basically the same thing. Charles obviously knows a lot about this case, and I agree with him philosophically on most issues. But he just sounds so damn full of himself virtually every time he posts. Try a little self-deprecation. A little humility injected here or there. None of us know everything. Unless we were part of the conspirator's team, we just look ridiculous to act so cryptically, to infer that we alone have some secret knowledge.

I apologize if it looks like I'm just being overly critical. This is Charles' forum, and he has the right to run it the way he wants. But just as I believe many people didn't even bother to read the content of Jim Fetzer's post on the EF, because of their offensive style, I think that people here are going to miss the content in Charles' posts, because of a similar offensive style.

Try minding your own business. My "style" is my business. Your observations relevant to it are neither insightful nor helpful to me or anyone else whose reading comprehension skills are above the third grade level.

Why do you and your short bus comrades insist upon arguing that the ignorance in which you dwell so blissfully is universally shared?

Offensive enough for you? If not, I can ratchet it up a few notches.

For the second time -- at least -- the DPF is NOT "Charles' forum." I am one of four owners. I do NOT have "the right to run it the way want." I'm not sure how I can state these facts more clearly so as to penetrate your bliss. Perhaps a different post for each word would do the trick.

Finally (would that it were so), you might want to spend a few weeks studying the definitions of "imply" and "infer."

Sorry if I'm being overly critical ...