Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[Charles Drago]

Charles, you are clearly incapable of even conceding that you might perhaps be wrong about anything.

Wrong again.

Read this thread carefully -- hope springs eternal -- and you'll discover my "I could be wrong" acknowledgment.

"Short bus comrades?" I was hoping your earlier juvenile slur was just a flippant, emotional defense mechanism. It appears ou have no problem with using terms that are offensive to anyone who has ever had a loved one whom others would call "retard."

No problem whatsoever. All who are offended by what I write are free not to read what I write.

Besides, what's all the fuss about? With certain duly noted exceptions, it is highly unlikely that anyone on the short bus would be able to read.

So much for this episode of Drool in the Sun.

I don't really care what Albert Doyle thinks about any aspect of this case- he has been accused unfairly of being anmposter, and I will always speak up for someone in that situation.

Wrong again.

Two esteemed colleagues and I have accumulated scores of pages of persuasive evidence to support the hypothesis that at least two individuals are posting over the "Albert Doyle" signature. This material soon will be shared.

Until then, why don't you share with us the evidence to support your "accused unfairly" declaration?

You might begin by demonstrating your understanding of just what the charge is against "Albert Doyle." To my knowledge, no one has accused "Doyle" of being an impostor.

Or even an anmposter.

And Jim Fetzer's name is being unfairly dragged through the mud here, by inferences that he is posting under Doyle's name. I don't know why he doesn't defend himself, but he seems not be frequenting any forums nowadays, and I had to say that I think it's outrageous to make these kinds of wild accusations.

Wrong again. (Check the short bus's exhaust system for leaks.)

No one has accused Fetzer of being one of "Doyle's" ghostwriters. Greg Burnham and I have noted multiple stylistic and rhetorical similarities between the offerings of one of the "Doyle" poseurs and Fetzer's work.

Read this thread carefully. Take notes. Think before you type. (Seems to me I've heard this song before ... )

I apologize for thinking this was your forum. Regardless, anyone who reads these threads knows that Charles is in Charge here.

Wrong again. (Seems to me I've heard this song before ... )

And I might add that once more you're unfairly ascribing to others your own inadequate powers of observation and reasoning.

Other than the above-noted problems ... another invaluable post, Don!