17-04-2009, 09:51 AM
(This post was last modified: 17-04-2009, 10:08 AM by Peter Lemkin.)
Peter Presland Wrote:Mark Stapleton Wrote:My money's on it being palleted in, as Harrit suggested, during the two weeks of heightened security, which ended a few days before the planes hit.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/attack/preparation.html
There was a good reason for the phone threats. It's a bit like Dealey Plaza in its clever planning. Nobody's going to question a few pallets while the Towers were swarming with security.
Maybe so. But I still think that speculation plays into the hands of the de-bunkers. Fair enough if, as was the case with the article linked by Peter L a week or so ago (The ceiling tiles etc one), you are addressing the specific de-bunker question of 'how could explosives possibly have been placed' and you frame your hypothesis accordingly, making it clear that it is subordinate to a proper investigation into the ESTABLISHED SCIENTIFIC FACTS and the multiple glaring discrepancies in the offical narrative.
It is just too easy to be drawn into labyrinthine speculative constructions that at best dissipate precious energy and at worst invite ridicule. Both seem counter-productive to me.
The real point is the science done and presented in the peer-reviewed article - and those that preceeded it and are to follow. The debunkers and Mockingbird assets will always attack something - even if not substantive and make character assassinations and throw out red-herrings. That's there job and raison d'etre. I just listened to the interview again [and a few others he had had prior to the article on Danish TV]. The translation is fine. It would have been best had the interviewer and the interviewee had kept to the published article, but he had been on Danish TV before talking about his hypotheses on how the buildings really might have been brought down, and was again speculating [not trying to wear the 'hat' of the research scientist] when he said he'd have brought them in on pallets. But when you think of it, and it was something in the range between 10-100 tons, how else do you bring it in but on pallets via the service elevators?! It could be unmarked or covered - or look like ceiling tiles or any number of other clever things. It could be at night or during the power-downs, security drills etc. No one would blink at [if they even saw] security-approved workmen moving pallets. It will be interesting now to see if any survivors of the towers remember or have already made statements that can help piece-together the details. The debunkers have a LONG way to go to dispell the extra energy released, the symetrical collapses, the near free-fall speeds, 2 planes but 3 buildings, chemical-signature thermite balls in the dust, unexploded nanothermite in the dust, and much more. Let them yell all they want about their own misdirections. The facts speak for themselves, as they did in Dallas. All we have to do it prove the offical fiction as impossible. Done in both cases. Anything more is icing on the cake, interesting, further evidence against the Big lies of the offical versions and an attempt to understand what did happen. Only a REAL investigation of either will disclose most of the details. We know enough now, if not in denial, to know the official versions were pure bull**** - and very cynical and malevelant bull****, at that.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass