19-12-2012, 08:35 PM
This isolation, when combined with the fact support of Cuba was clearly at the covert level when it involved Dallas, makes it a near certainty that these new backers were associated with the main players. As Piper shows there was no reasonable way for any "jew backers" to disassociate from those covert zionist and Lansky interests once you got to that level.
A presumption plus a "fact" which is "clear" produces "near certainty" these Jews (subjunctive voice) were "associated" with the "main players."
"Main players" being a wholly-owned trademark of A Priori Productions, who stipulate the mighty Oz "shows" there was no "reasonable" way for these Jews to "dissociate" from "covert zionist and Lansky interests" (Dow Jones symbol CZLI) "once you got to that level"--
What level was that?
The level at which an entire floor of headless mannequins say, "Jews killed Kennedy; Piper proved it--case closed"?
Bugliosi says if Oswald didn't kill Kennedy, Kennedy wasn't killed. McAdams says no proof of Ferrie-Oswald association. Specter says if A-Y, then Z. Ford says wound is mobile.
None of the above have any proof.
A presumption plus a "fact" which is "clear" produces "near certainty" these Jews (subjunctive voice) were "associated" with the "main players."
"Main players" being a wholly-owned trademark of A Priori Productions, who stipulate the mighty Oz "shows" there was no "reasonable" way for these Jews to "dissociate" from "covert zionist and Lansky interests" (Dow Jones symbol CZLI) "once you got to that level"--
What level was that?
The level at which an entire floor of headless mannequins say, "Jews killed Kennedy; Piper proved it--case closed"?
Bugliosi says if Oswald didn't kill Kennedy, Kennedy wasn't killed. McAdams says no proof of Ferrie-Oswald association. Specter says if A-Y, then Z. Ford says wound is mobile.
None of the above have any proof.