Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[David Josephs]

Your mouth keeps moving but nothing seems to ever come out of it....

When and if you EVER address the LACK OF EVIDENCE in support of Piper I can once again take you seriously.
Until then you simply sound like a disgruntled troll -

In Internet slang, a troll ( /ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is someone who posts inflammatory,[SUP][1][/SUP] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[SUP][2][/SUP] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion

you can't even provide anything from the book that connects MOSLEY, claiming HOMER said JEWS, to actual PEOPLE other than thru wild speculation.

The only admission I will make is that I am sick and tired of your tactics and inability to respond honestly to any request for PROOF from the book.
You play the game like DVP's LNer act.... terribly wrong analysis of pretty simply stuff resulting in conclusions that have no base in reality

OPEN the MF'ing thing - find a passage that supports what you claim

AND POST IT...

Otherwise, you and your posting buddies are off my radar... we can let Greg, Seamus and CD deal with you.
I'm done.

Albert - You've been asked numerous times...

If you don't like what I post from Piper... post what YOU THINK represents your POV as supported by Piper...
YOU'RE the one who keeps saying we haven't read the book and don't know the material well enough - but YOU DO.

POST SOMETHING from the book Albert...

Simple.

Since you are basically admitting all of your attempts at obfuscation have blown up on you shouldn't what we've already posted have been enough? (David will follow with a lengthy post explaining how he hasn't admitted anything. At that point I think we are both saying the same thing - which appears to be a trend in here, that is, not admitting anything about Piper)


I think you have nerve posing yourself this way since you still haven't answered how any "new jew backers" could get so deep into the conspiracy and not be involved with the major players? Mark did make a good point when he said jews were still isolated in 1963 into ethnic groups. This isolation, when combined with the fact support of Cuba was clearly at the covert level when it involved Dallas, makes it a near certainty that these new backers were associated with the main players. As Piper shows there was no reasonable way for any "jew backers" to disassociate from those covert zionist and Lansky interests once you got to that level. They would automatically be under their control. Plus, if these backers were separate from the main conspirators I don't think those conspirators would let any freelancers walk right into their plot. Since your responses make no effort to either acknowledge or answer this I don't think you're being honest.