Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First a rhetorical question and then an observation.
#1
Who ordered the 112th M.I.G. to stand down in Dallas November 1963? OK more properly I should phrase it as "Who had the command authority to stand down the 112th M.I.G. telling them another unit will assume your duties to relieve your Group"?

My best answer is that command authority would be J.C.S. (Joint Chief of Staff) level or Cabinet level authority. Reportedly it is codeword level "protected" security.

That was the rhetorical query and my conclusion.

My conclusion is reasonable I think.

Unreasonable is the forced conclusion that some at a very high level of authority were quite disloyal to the selected, elected Chief Executive. From inside his own government someone knew better than the American voters and their President what America needed. What America needed was a Murder.

This conclusion pulled me into a more "let me follow the command authority" of this Conspiracy and consequently away from the trajectories and angles. Shooters are cheap and easy to train given time and easily disposable after the Murders.

I found myself forced into the conclusion that the Conspiracy was from a higher level of power than even the J.C.S and Cabinet level.

Wm. Greer did stop. He did stop for snipers. I tried to excuse him by thinking of incoming fire from the front intimidating his "advance".
No.

NO! His training was to get-the-****-outta-dodge.
Which is the exact training point given to the lowest M/T (motor-transport) driver in reacting to incoming fire. Go! and Go Now! Go and don't block the means of travel (road, trail, creek bed or trackless waste or alternate means) and Oh yeah, beware of mines - today IEDs.

I mean would you slow down? Would you stop under fire? Only if you were in on the Coup or saw "stopping for snipers" as a means to insure personal survival of that Coup.

I have to conclude many disloyal powerful individuals Conspired to strip protection from the President and place killers and weaponry into Dallas.

In the words of Fletcher Prouty: "Very clever planning".

The first query above moved me into Deep Politics and out of the who shot from where and when and how often.
That was an empowering change to me.

Maybe there is another person to read this and wonder: OK, who had the command authority to accomplish the deeds required to kill our President so easily and so quickly?

Maybe they will look wider and deeper into the Coup as I did.
A good thing.
Read not to contradict and confute;
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON
Reply


Messages In This Thread
First a rhetorical question and then an observation. - by Jim Hackett II - 29-04-2013, 11:58 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  James DiEugenio, I have a single question, would you answer? Scott Kaiser 12 7,848 11-06-2019, 04:32 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Question to David Josephs re: WCD 298 Bob Prudhomme 4 2,918 01-03-2015, 07:37 PM
Last Post: Chris Davidson
  Question Scott Kaiser 0 1,886 31-10-2014, 04:51 PM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Question Scott Kaiser 6 3,869 06-07-2014, 05:01 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  LHO: 48 hours to live question Drew Phipps 4 3,247 16-06-2014, 03:01 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  Earl Warren question Richard Coleman 24 10,712 03-05-2014, 01:59 PM
Last Post: Drew Phipps
  Legal Question for Dawn Meredith Bob Prudhomme 14 6,321 17-04-2014, 06:53 AM
Last Post: Marc Ellis
  Palmprint question Richard Coleman 3 2,856 30-11-2013, 08:33 PM
Last Post: LR Trotter
  Ferrie and Oswald question Richard Coleman 6 4,202 06-10-2013, 04:39 PM
Last Post: Tracy Riddle
  Altgens may have been a few frames earlier... an observation David Josephs 0 2,019 26-08-2013, 12:32 AM
Last Post: David Josephs

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)