Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
50 Years On, Finding Profit in 'Truth' on JFK Case
#12
Some like Epstein did a measure of good work for a season. Then heard the siren call it seems.
That obviously continues as a strategy of tension's tactic today. The Confuseum is my thought.

Others like Pose-ner may have been born to the siren call.
Bugliosi? O'Reilly? Hanks? The pattern is nothing new.
I find comfort in that the Enemy is pinned to at best the HSCA/WC ver. 2.
Makes it easier to spot deception junk.

Sherry Fiester's work I can support in two major extents. One the trajectory she posits I find quite real and better still supported by solid evidence. Two her work as Phil said well, additionally shreds the Magic Bullet to Ray Marcus' "Bastard Bullet" in equally effective manner as her trajectory work.

Too much is too easy to refute in the Enemy's tired games.

Too much has become documented. Enough cats are out of the bag.
Their can only be one reason the CIA still refuses to release the DRE/Joannides files, that would be where the evidence would lead. Whatever that would exactly be.
Something the Enemy is working hard to hide.

Most here have to know already that the revolution will not be televised, neither will the truth, neither televised, nor spoken in radio, nor printed in controlled outlets.

The events the Enemy hid or continues to hide, taken as a whole are revealing.
PaperClip, Gehlen's Org, AWDulles covert empire independent of the USGovernment but inside the games of the Beltway always, (see Evica's "A Certain Arrogance")
Joannides, Jack White's "photogrammetry" rebuff, on and on. (HSCA publications)

All Lies of Cover-Up
The Enemy is trapped in their own crap.

All of it points to the ST Government and its desire for unending war.
The total control of information is a characteristic of fascist governments.

The trio of the moment - Bugliosi, Hanks and O'Reilly?
No possible way to think the truth will ever be borne by them.
Any more than the knowing can expect truth from Dunkel, or Nolan/McAdams or Pose-ner.
They can only deceive the uninformed.

Me?
I'll keep Prouty, Jones Jr., Garrison, Meagher, Brussels and Ferrell as my own choices.
Read not to contradict and confute;
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON
Reply


Messages In This Thread
50 Years On, Finding Profit in 'Truth' on JFK Case - by Jim Hackett II - 12-05-2013, 11:45 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  If the case against Oswald was legitimate Gil Jesus 0 185 04-07-2024, 12:11 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Government's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part III Gil Jesus 0 467 10-12-2023, 12:08 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Govenment's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part II Gil Jesus 1 518 28-11-2023, 03:36 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Why the Government's case against Oswald is BS --- Part I Gil Jesus 1 550 15-11-2023, 04:55 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Evidence of Witness Tampering in the case against Oswald Gil Jesus 0 591 28-07-2023, 11:31 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Was the TFX Case a Scandal? Jim DiEugenio 0 2,266 04-02-2020, 11:58 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  The Uses of Public Relations in the JFK case Jim DiEugenio 0 1,888 11-01-2020, 05:41 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Finally: the Hammarskjold case is Moving Jim DiEugenio 14 16,097 04-09-2019, 10:34 PM
Last Post: Richard Coleman
  The Tippit Case in the New Millenium Jim DiEugenio 192 203,003 23-06-2019, 10:25 AM
Last Post: Milo Reech
  Deep Truth Journal: First Issue Jim DiEugenio 0 5,023 29-12-2018, 09:29 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)