14-08-2013, 09:39 AM
Besides valuable pieces of information (about the Mexico City incidents, for example), Armstrongs concept is trying to merge the several Oswald-Doppelgängers, of which we know (some of them not even resembling LHO) into one long term Ossi-Imposter. A concept as simple as false.
That he put this concept into the greater context of the huge conspiracy in which we on this forum believe, is a trick, to make his false concept more attractive.
I fear, Armstrong is unable to answer questions about the whereabouts of the family members of his artificial "second-long-term" Oswald...
Maybe Armstrong can answer the Olmstead -question:
Armstrongs thesis is:
Two young boys, AMERICAN-BORN Lee Oswald and an eastern European refugee who spoke Russian
and was given the name "Harvey Oswald," were selected by the CIA for inclusion in a super-secret
project known as MK/ULTRA in the early 1950s. The plan was to merge the identity of the two over
a period of years and then, if successful, to place the Russian-speaking refugee with an American
identity into the Soviet Union as a spy
Olmstead replied to that and had a question:
OLMSTEAD REPLIES:
First, there was no need to adopt the identity of Lee Harvey Oswald to provide a "new cover" for the
"refugee". Under Title 10 USC Subtitle C-Navy and Marine Corps Chapter 537, sec 5532 and 5533,
once the "refugee" was 14 years of age, he could enlist in the service under Sec 5533.
If there was no birth certificate for the young boy...the enlisting officer only had to "confirm" that
this individual was who he said he was. It was quite simple to give somebody a new name and a new
life...without involvement of "another". This law was changed after 1964......but was in effect during
the 1948-1964 period.
Why go through all the "trouble"...when things could be done quickly and legally as well as "deep undercover"?
We are still waiting for an answer.
KK
That he put this concept into the greater context of the huge conspiracy in which we on this forum believe, is a trick, to make his false concept more attractive.
I fear, Armstrong is unable to answer questions about the whereabouts of the family members of his artificial "second-long-term" Oswald...
Maybe Armstrong can answer the Olmstead -question:
Armstrongs thesis is:
Two young boys, AMERICAN-BORN Lee Oswald and an eastern European refugee who spoke Russian
and was given the name "Harvey Oswald," were selected by the CIA for inclusion in a super-secret
project known as MK/ULTRA in the early 1950s. The plan was to merge the identity of the two over
a period of years and then, if successful, to place the Russian-speaking refugee with an American
identity into the Soviet Union as a spy
Olmstead replied to that and had a question:
OLMSTEAD REPLIES:
First, there was no need to adopt the identity of Lee Harvey Oswald to provide a "new cover" for the
"refugee". Under Title 10 USC Subtitle C-Navy and Marine Corps Chapter 537, sec 5532 and 5533,
once the "refugee" was 14 years of age, he could enlist in the service under Sec 5533.
If there was no birth certificate for the young boy...the enlisting officer only had to "confirm" that
this individual was who he said he was. It was quite simple to give somebody a new name and a new
life...without involvement of "another". This law was changed after 1964......but was in effect during
the 1948-1964 period.
Why go through all the "trouble"...when things could be done quickly and legally as well as "deep undercover"?
We are still waiting for an answer.
KK