John Armstrong's Harvey and Lee

[Karl Kinaski]

Quote Greg Burnham: Judyth Vary Baker in Exile Thread Ed-Forum, page 51.

(The thread mutated in a Armstrong vs Baker threat on that pages)

...if we are to accept Armstrong's account, the Oswald that Judyth knew was HARVEY not LEE. And the one Judyth claims to have known was (according to Armstrong) HARVEY (who could not drive) -- but who was known to Judyth (according to Judyth) as Lee (who could drive). Mind boggling--

Personally, I have a very difficult time accepting that any Soviet double-agent, or false defector, or infiltrator, or--in other words--SPY-- would not have been taught to drive for purposes of "cover story" if nothing else.

A LNter, can proof a CTer wrong on certain aspects. Parnell did so (if he is a LNter at all):

Quote Parnell:

The October 15, 1956 induction of "Lee" Oswald creates a huge problem for the Armstrong team. On that day "Lee" was fingerprinted and assigned serial number 1653230. In December of the same year he was photographed (popularly known as the 13-inch head photo which BTW also has been debunked) with his serial number displayed at the bottom of the picture. These two records disprove the Armstrong theory since the HSCA matched the fingerprints from October 1956 to prints taken of LHO in custody in Dallas and New Orleans in 1963. The problem is, those are supposed to be the prints of "Harvey" Oswald. Similarly, the December photo is said to be that of "Lee" while the HSCA photo panel proved using morphological data that it matched photos of "Harvey".

KK

The purpose of the HSCA was to HIDE the CIA's Oswald project, not shed any light on it. Jack White repeatedly told us that when he tried to introduce a photo montage of different Oswald faces, he was told by one of the HSCA attorneys that he would be charged with contempt if he did. Anything we learn from the HSCA (or the Warren Commission) about Oswald's intelligence connection is an accident, something they forgot to hide.

In 1996 former HSCA counsel Robert Tanenbaum testified to the ARRB about what the HSCA should have done, but didn't: "The major area, and I can't overemphasize this, focused on the government and what the government knew about Lee Harvey Oswald... and what the CIA was doing with Lee Harvey Oswald. And what he was doing in New Orleans with anti-Castro Cubans, rabid anti-Castro Cubans, and to get everything you could get from the government with respect to it. And how this government today could want to hold that information and feed the kind of anti-government feeling that results from non-disclosure is really beyond my comprehension."

There is clear evidence that both Oswalds were in the USMC. Gosh, can you think of any government agency that had the power to make sure the HSCA got the RIGHT fingerprints for Agent Oswald??? Golly, just couldn't happen, right? HSCA my ass....

Now why don't you tell me how two 6-year-old gunshot wounds disappeared from Agent Oswald's left arm?

Do I understand you right: whenever the HSCA is producing a document which not fit Armstrongs "Two long term Ossis Scenario", the HSCA is hiding something?

LOL

Sure the HSCA was hiding something: but not the Armstrong theorie, which is full of holes, distortions and slips. HARVEY AND LEE is a convincing book at first glance, but when you read it with a critical mind, it is Swiss cheese: like the PENTAGON PAPERS, or THE ZAPRUDER FILM.



BTW: The Klein chapter of HARVEY AND LEE is a good one. BUT the chapter only proves, that LHO had not ordered that gun. I am fine with that. I do not need to tie this fact to the two-long-term-ossis-scenario...