19-08-2013, 08:52 PM
Q: Can you describe his neck wound? . . .
DR. PERRY: The neck wound, as visible on the patient, revealed a bullet hole almost in the mid line.
Q: What was that?
DR. PERRY: / bullet hole almost in the mid line.
Q: Would you demonstrate?
DR. PERRY: In the lower portion of the neck, in front.
Q. Can you demonstrate, Doctor, on your own neck?
DR. PERRY: Approximately here (indicating).
Q. Below the Adam's apple?
DR. PERRY: Below the Adam's apple.
Q. Doctor, it is the assumption that it was through the head?
DR. PERRY: That would be on(ly) conjecture on my part. There are two wounds, as Dr. Clark noted, one of the neck and one of the head. Whether they are directly related or related to two bullets, I cannot say.
Q. Where was the entrance wound?
DR. PERRY: There was an entrance wound in the neck. As regards the one in the head, I cannot say.
Q. Which way was the bullet coming on the neck wound? At him?
DR. PERRY: It appeared to be coming at him. . . .
Q. Doctor, describe the entrance wound. You think from the front in the throat?
DR. PERRY: The wound appeared to be an entrance wound in the front of the throat; yes, that is correct. The exit wound, I don't know. It could have been the head or there could have been a second wound of the head. There was not time to determine this at the particular instant.
Q. Would the bullet have had to travel up from the neck wound to exit through the back?
DR. PERRY: Unless it was deviated from its course by striking bone or some other object. . . .
Phil's footnote:
Have they sanitized the youtube of this exchange, or entered a cloaking algorithm in the search engines
Hanks and Bugliosi are abetted by the shrieking fairies of the ministry of ruth
DR. PERRY: The neck wound, as visible on the patient, revealed a bullet hole almost in the mid line.
Q: What was that?
DR. PERRY: / bullet hole almost in the mid line.
Q: Would you demonstrate?
DR. PERRY: In the lower portion of the neck, in front.
Q. Can you demonstrate, Doctor, on your own neck?
DR. PERRY: Approximately here (indicating).
Q. Below the Adam's apple?
DR. PERRY: Below the Adam's apple.
Q. Doctor, it is the assumption that it was through the head?
DR. PERRY: That would be on(ly) conjecture on my part. There are two wounds, as Dr. Clark noted, one of the neck and one of the head. Whether they are directly related or related to two bullets, I cannot say.
Q. Where was the entrance wound?
DR. PERRY: There was an entrance wound in the neck. As regards the one in the head, I cannot say.
Q. Which way was the bullet coming on the neck wound? At him?
DR. PERRY: It appeared to be coming at him. . . .
Q. Doctor, describe the entrance wound. You think from the front in the throat?
DR. PERRY: The wound appeared to be an entrance wound in the front of the throat; yes, that is correct. The exit wound, I don't know. It could have been the head or there could have been a second wound of the head. There was not time to determine this at the particular instant.
Q. Would the bullet have had to travel up from the neck wound to exit through the back?
DR. PERRY: Unless it was deviated from its course by striking bone or some other object. . . .
Phil's footnote:
Have they sanitized the youtube of this exchange, or entered a cloaking algorithm in the search engines
Hanks and Bugliosi are abetted by the shrieking fairies of the ministry of ruth