24-08-2013, 08:05 AM
Quote:The second thing that is going on is that the individual frames are being moved through the camera's gate, momentarily pausing for exposure, followed by the next frame etc etc.
Frankly Jeff extremely poor... this is simply not correct. The film does not"pause"... the rotating aperture allows light in, in-sync with the passing film… the speed of the action sending light to the film is what determines what images are caught as the aperture is open…
if what you are saying is correct we should also be seeing action SLOWER than normal by a factor of 50% as often as we are seeing action FASTER than normal… can you point to the grouping of frames that you've found to have produced SLOWER than normal action… I have only found where movement is impossibly FAST, not slow.
The amount of variance in film speed you offer is once again, simply wrong… and based on very poor logic. Your statements about this and most every other subject to date has been filled with inaccuracy at every turn. and yet you just keep going...
The thread is about the alteration of the film… you state at the beginning you feel that the extant film is not the in camera film… HELP the thread by offering what you feel is supporting evidence for the HOW or WHEN or this alteration/switch
and then….
PLEASE start a new thread discussing your camera and film "fun facts" in an attempt to convince others. Maybe others here who also have an understanding of how THAT camera worked can help clarify the situation on YOUR thread…
Cool?
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter