24-08-2013, 12:14 PM
Often we utilize our deep understanding of the JFK assassination cover-up as a template for investigations of similar deep political events.
When we apply it to the study of the Diana assassination cover-up, we quickly confront the likelihood that this confession is modeled on the disingenuous mea culpas of confessed JFK "shooters" James Files and Loy Factor, and the designed-to-disinform deathbed tell-all of E. Howard Hunt.
In my view, the story of "Soldier N" is simply too novelistic to be true. He allegedly told his wife that there is a Mission Impossible-esque "box which members of his unit use for private jobs ... They put in the box the name, address and details of what they want done and then one of them who wants to earn extra money does that job."
Reads like classic tradecraft to me.
Look for this story to be torn to pieces as the 50th anniversary of JFK's murder approaches.
Another possibility: A variation of the doppelganger gambit may be in play -- one in which some sort of "official" investigation of the tale concludes that it's probably true. Now why does this seem vaguely familiar?
Oh. Right. The Warren Commission v. House Select Committee on Assassinations respective lone nut and conspiracy conclusions.
Doubt. Endless doubt.
Cover-up. Endless cover-up.
When we apply it to the study of the Diana assassination cover-up, we quickly confront the likelihood that this confession is modeled on the disingenuous mea culpas of confessed JFK "shooters" James Files and Loy Factor, and the designed-to-disinform deathbed tell-all of E. Howard Hunt.
In my view, the story of "Soldier N" is simply too novelistic to be true. He allegedly told his wife that there is a Mission Impossible-esque "box which members of his unit use for private jobs ... They put in the box the name, address and details of what they want done and then one of them who wants to earn extra money does that job."
Reads like classic tradecraft to me.
Look for this story to be torn to pieces as the 50th anniversary of JFK's murder approaches.
Another possibility: A variation of the doppelganger gambit may be in play -- one in which some sort of "official" investigation of the tale concludes that it's probably true. Now why does this seem vaguely familiar?
Oh. Right. The Warren Commission v. House Select Committee on Assassinations respective lone nut and conspiracy conclusions.
Doubt. Endless doubt.
Cover-up. Endless cover-up.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene