24-08-2013, 09:03 PM
The initiation of the Dopplegangers from Dresden (with apologies to Ira Levin and Gregory Peck) may have foreseen precisely the need which greenlighted their final act.
In 1952 Eisenhower, who had used C.D. Jackson for psyops, chose C.D. Jackson for psyops.
The general who organized D-Day (which utilized a Man Who Never Was) left the world to the Dulles Brothers ("Regime Change R Us").
Would the men who mastered outthinking (then incorporated) the likes of Gehlen et al, who were in the sauna with the Heydrich op and Valkyrie not see that the game would rely on Ike II: Nixon the Understudy assuming the role as figurehead.
Would these men not also have foreseen the unthinkable, that an anti-fascist might displace this heir apparent.
In which case we have at hand a universal patsy in the uniform of the Enemy.
We're always presented with ad hoc "plots"--when there was nothing ad hoc about the security state, the shadow government, neither then nor at any time of the Century of the Fed.
Did Forrestal decide to sky dive; did Acheson innocently omit Korea.
Are there coincidences.
If the Opposition might cooperate in the removal of the inconvenient Patton, might Marina be a part of a continuing wink/nod arrangement.
If Dulles were present when Lenin was sent to Petrograd (and helped Bormann with his travel bookings) isn't planning what a director of plans does?
Didn't Helms have a plan for Nixon when the time was ripe?
Hunt is in his own words a benchwarmer--and when the coach said, Hunt, in you go, K-38 Left, there's our man in fill-in-the-blank.
Coincidence and happenstance are part of the costumes called for from the wardrobe girl.
I have the massive Harvey & Lee tome--it bespeaks the work of those used to writing the encyclopedia.
In 1952 Eisenhower, who had used C.D. Jackson for psyops, chose C.D. Jackson for psyops.
The general who organized D-Day (which utilized a Man Who Never Was) left the world to the Dulles Brothers ("Regime Change R Us").
Would the men who mastered outthinking (then incorporated) the likes of Gehlen et al, who were in the sauna with the Heydrich op and Valkyrie not see that the game would rely on Ike II: Nixon the Understudy assuming the role as figurehead.
Would these men not also have foreseen the unthinkable, that an anti-fascist might displace this heir apparent.
In which case we have at hand a universal patsy in the uniform of the Enemy.
We're always presented with ad hoc "plots"--when there was nothing ad hoc about the security state, the shadow government, neither then nor at any time of the Century of the Fed.
Did Forrestal decide to sky dive; did Acheson innocently omit Korea.
Are there coincidences.
If the Opposition might cooperate in the removal of the inconvenient Patton, might Marina be a part of a continuing wink/nod arrangement.
If Dulles were present when Lenin was sent to Petrograd (and helped Bormann with his travel bookings) isn't planning what a director of plans does?
Didn't Helms have a plan for Nixon when the time was ripe?
Hunt is in his own words a benchwarmer--and when the coach said, Hunt, in you go, K-38 Left, there's our man in fill-in-the-blank.
Coincidence and happenstance are part of the costumes called for from the wardrobe girl.
I have the massive Harvey & Lee tome--it bespeaks the work of those used to writing the encyclopedia.